Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Park Göztepe Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Jun;30(6):451-457. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.49500.
This study compares the efficacy and safety of lateral approach surgery with and without radial nerve dissection in treating humeral diaphyseal fractures. It assesses clinical, radiological, and complication outcomes, providing a description of the surgical methods and perioperative benefits.
We retrospectively analyzed data from 71 patients admitted between May 2015 and December 2022 who underwent lateral approach surgery for humeral diaphyseal fractures. Group 1, consisting of 34 patients without radial nerve dissection, and Group 2, comprising 37 patients with radial nerve dissection, were compared. Parameters such as age, gender, fracture side (right/left), fracture type, follow-up time, surgical duration, blood loss, radiological and clinical evaluations (including Shoulder-Elbow range of motion [ROM] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score [Q-DASH]), and complications were examined. Surgical techniques and outcomes were documented.
Both groups exhibited comparable distributions in age, gender, fracture types, and follow-up times (p>0.05). Group 1 demonstrated significantly lower surgical duration and blood loss compared to Group 2 (p<0.05 for both). Clinical assessment revealed satisfactory shoulder and elbow ROM within functional limits for all patients, with no instances of infection. Q-DASH scores were similar between groups. Postoperative radial nerve palsy occurred in one patient in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2, with all cases resolving uneventfully during outpatient follow-ups. Radiological assessment confirmed uneventful union in all patients.
Lateral approach surgery without radial nerve dissection for humeral diaphyseal fractures offers comparable effectiveness and safety to conventional surgery, with potential perioperative advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss.
本研究比较了经外侧入路手术治疗肱骨干骨折时是否行桡神经显露的疗效和安全性。评估了临床、影像学和并发症结果,描述了手术方法和围手术期的获益。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 5 月至 2022 年 12 月期间收治的 71 例行肱骨干骨折外侧入路手术的患者资料。无桡神经显露的 34 例患者纳入组 1,有桡神经显露的 37 例患者纳入组 2。比较了两组患者的年龄、性别、骨折侧(右侧/左侧)、骨折类型、随访时间、手术时间、出血量、影像学和临床评估(包括肩肘活动度和简易上肢功能测试评分)以及并发症。记录了手术技术和结果。
两组患者的年龄、性别、骨折类型和随访时间分布无显著差异(p>0.05)。组 1 的手术时间和出血量明显低于组 2(均 p<0.05)。所有患者的肩关节和肘关节活动度均在功能范围内,无感染发生。两组患者的简易上肢功能测试评分无显著差异。术后桡神经麻痹发生在组 1 1 例和组 2 3 例患者中,所有病例在门诊随访中均顺利恢复。影像学评估显示所有患者均愈合良好。
对于肱骨干骨折,经外侧入路手术不显露桡神经与传统手术相比具有相似的疗效和安全性,可能具有减少手术时间和出血量等围手术期优势。