• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β-内酰胺类抗生素在成人脓毒症或感染性休克中持续输注与间断输注的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prolonged vs Intermittent Infusions of β-Lactam Antibiotics in Adults With Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2024 Aug 27;332(8):638-648. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.9803.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.9803
PMID:38864162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11170459/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prolonged β-lactam antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions.

DATA SOURCES

The primary search was conducted with MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2, 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials comparing prolonged (continuous or extended) and intermittent infusions of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A bayesian framework was used as the primary analysis approach and a frequentist framework as the secondary approach.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical cure.

RESULTS

From 18 eligible randomized clinical trials that included 9108 critically ill adults with sepsis or septic shock (median age, 54 years; IQR, 48-57; 5961 men [65%]), 17 trials (9014 participants) contributed data to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio for all-cause 90-day mortality for prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics compared with intermittent infusions was 0.86 (95% credible interval, 0.72-0.98; I2 = 21.5%; high certainty), with a 99.1% posterior probability that prolonged infusions were associated with lower 90-day mortality. Prolonged infusion of β-lactam antibiotics was associated with a reduced risk of intensive care unit mortality (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.70-0.97; high certainty) and an increase in clinical cure (risk ratio, 1.16; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.31; moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults in the intensive care unit who had sepsis or septic shock, the use of prolonged β-lactam antibiotic infusions was associated with a reduced risk of 90-day mortality compared with intermittent infusions. The current evidence presents a high degree of certainty for clinicians to consider prolonged infusions as a standard of care in the management of sepsis and septic shock.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023399434.

摘要

重要性

目前尚不确定延长β-内酰胺类抗生素输注时间是否能改善脓毒症或感染性休克的危重症成人患者的临床重要结局。

目的

旨在确定与间歇性输注相比,延长β-内酰胺类抗生素输注时间是否会降低危重症成人脓毒症或感染性休克患者的死亡风险。

数据来源

主要检索了 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和 ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间截至 2024 年 5 月 2 日。

研究选择

比较延长(持续或延长)和间歇性输注β-内酰胺类抗生素在脓毒症或感染性休克的危重症成人患者中的疗效的随机临床试验。

数据提取和偏倚评估

由两名评审员独立进行数据提取和偏倚评估。使用推荐评估、制定与评估分级方法评估证据确定性。贝叶斯框架被用作主要分析方法,而频率论框架被用作次要方法。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为全因 90 天死亡率。次要结局包括 ICU 死亡率和临床治愈率。

结果

从 18 项纳入了 9108 例脓毒症或感染性休克的危重症成人患者(中位年龄 54 岁,IQR 48-57;5961 例男性[65%])的合格随机临床试验中,17 项试验(9014 名参与者)提供了主要结局的数据。与间歇性输注相比,延长β-内酰胺类抗生素输注时间的全因 90 天死亡率的估计风险比为 0.86(95%可信区间,0.72-0.98;I2=21.5%;高确定性),99.1%的后验概率表明延长输注与较低的 90 天死亡率相关。延长β-内酰胺类抗生素输注与 ICU 死亡率降低相关(风险比,0.84;95%可信区间,0.70-0.97;高确定性),且临床治愈率增加(风险比,1.16;95%可信区间,1.07-1.31;中等确定性)。

结论和相关性

在 ICU 中的患有脓毒症或感染性休克的成年人中,与间歇性输注相比,使用延长β-内酰胺类抗生素输注时间与降低 90 天死亡率相关。目前的证据为临床医生提供了高度确定性,认为延长输注可以作为脓毒症和感染性休克管理的标准治疗方法。

试验注册

PROSPERO 标识符:CRD42023399434。

相似文献

1
Prolonged vs Intermittent Infusions of β-Lactam Antibiotics in Adults With Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.β-内酰胺类抗生素在成人脓毒症或感染性休克中持续输注与间断输注的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2024 Aug 27;332(8):638-648. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.9803.
2
Continuous vs Intermittent β-Lactam Antibiotic Infusions in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The BLING III Randomized Clinical Trial.连续与间断β-内酰胺类抗生素输注治疗脓毒症危重症患者的比较:BLING III 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Aug 27;332(8):629-637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.9779.
3
Standard versus double dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients with sepsis: The BULLSEYE study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.脓毒症重症患者中β-内酰胺类抗生素标准剂量与双倍剂量对比研究:一项多中心随机对照试验的BULLSEYE研究方案
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10747-3.
4
High-volume haemofiltration for sepsis in adults.成人脓毒症的高容量血液滤过
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 31;1(1):CD008075. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008075.pub3.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
A protocol for a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotic infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis: BLING III.一项关于脓毒症重症患者连续与间歇β-内酰胺类抗生素输注的3期多中心随机对照试验方案:BLING III
Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Mar;21(1):63-68.
7
Continuous versus intermittent bolus dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics in a South African multi-disciplinary intensive care unit: A randomized controlled trial.南非多学科重症监护病房中β-内酰胺类抗生素持续给药与间歇推注给药的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Infect. 2025 May;90(5):106487. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106487. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
8
Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The MERCY Randomized Clinical Trial.连续性与间歇性美罗培南给药在脓毒症危重症患者中的比较:MERCY 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 11;330(2):141-151. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10598.
9
Continuous versus Intermittent β-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis. A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data from Randomized Trials.严重脓毒症中连续与间断β-内酰胺输注的比较。来自随机试验的个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep 15;194(6):681-91. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201601-0024OC.
10
Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotics intravenous infusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.脓毒症或感染性休克患者中β-内酰胺类抗生素持续静脉输注与间歇静脉输注策略的比较:一项对随机试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
J Intensive Care. 2020 Oct 6;8:77. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00490-z. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
[Focus on sepsis and general intensive care medicine 2024/2025 : Summary of selected intensive medical care studies].[聚焦2024/2025年脓毒症与普通重症医学:精选重症医学研究综述]
Anaesthesiologie. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00101-025-01589-4.
2
Antibiotic therapy for severe bacterial infections.针对严重细菌感染的抗生素治疗。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08063-0.
3
[S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].[S3 脓毒症预防、诊断、治疗及随访指南 - 2025年更新版]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01317-1.
4
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting prognosis in sepsis patients with a history of cancer who were admitted to the intensive care unit.用于预测入住重症监护病房的有癌症病史的脓毒症患者预后的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
J Int Med Res. 2025 Aug;53(8):3000605251362991. doi: 10.1177/03000605251362991. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
5
Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam optimised dosing regimens for critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy.美罗培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦用于接受肾脏替代治疗的重症患者的优化给药方案。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08067-w.
6
Impact of Extending Beta-Lactam Infusions on IV Access Requirements.延长β-内酰胺类药物输注时间对静脉通路需求的影响。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Aug 4;7(8):e1299. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001299. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
7
Implementation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Continuous Infusions for Critically Ill Patients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review.对重症患者实施哌拉西林-他唑巴坦持续输注:一项单中心回顾性病历审查
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2025 Aug 13;78(3):e3710. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3710. eCollection 2025.
8
Antibiotic Therapy Duration for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: An Evidence-Based Review.耐多药革兰氏阴性菌感染的抗生素治疗疗程:一项基于证据的综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 18;26(14):6905. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146905.
9
Research without prior consent procedure and intervention effect on mortality in critical care: a meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials.重症监护中未经事先同意程序的研究及其对死亡率的干预效果:一项随机对照试验的元流行病学研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 24;29(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05480-x.
10
Enough is Enough: Continuous Beta-Lactam Infusions for Treating Serious Infections.适可而止:持续β-内酰胺类药物输注治疗严重感染
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2024 Dec 19;9(4):200-203. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2024-1104. eCollection 2024 Dec.