Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Farmácia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Rua Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Partenon, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2024 Jun 10;96(2):e20231068. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202420231068. eCollection 2024.
Open access (OA) publishing provides free online access to research articles without subscription fees. In Brazil, absence of financial support from academic institutions and limited government policies pose challenges to OA publication. Here, we used data from the Web of Science and Scopus to compare with global trends in journal accessibility and scientific quality metrics. Brazilian authors publish more OA articles, particularly in Global South journals. While OA correlates with quality for global authors, it had no impact on Brazilian science. To maximize impact, Brazilian authors should prioritize Q1 journals regardless of OA status. High-impact or Global North journal publication seems more relevant for Brazilian science than OA. Our findings indicate that the present open access policy has been ineffective to improve the impact of Brazilian science, providing insights to guide the formulation of scientific public policies.
开放获取(OA)出版为研究文章提供了免费的在线访问,无需订阅费用。在巴西,学术机构缺乏财政支持和有限的政府政策对 OA 出版构成了挑战。在这里,我们使用了来自 Web of Science 和 Scopus 的数据来比较期刊可及性和科学质量指标的全球趋势。巴西作者发表了更多的 OA 文章,特别是在全球南方的期刊上。虽然 OA 与全球作者的质量相关,但它对巴西科学没有影响。为了最大限度地提高影响力,巴西作者应该优先考虑 Q1 期刊,而不论 OA 状态如何。高影响力或北美期刊的出版对巴西科学似乎比 OA 更重要。我们的研究结果表明,目前的开放获取政策对提高巴西科学的影响力并没有效果,为指导科学公共政策的制定提供了一些见解。