Center of Medical Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, University City, n/a, President Castelo Branco III. Complex, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Center of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pernambuco, Príncipe Street, 693, Soledade, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Sep;339:115994. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115994. Epub 2024 May 31.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the comparative effectiveness of ketamine versus electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for the treatment of major depressive episodes (MDEs). PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ketamine and ECT for MDE. The primary outcome was response rate, for which we prespecified a non-inferiority margin of -0.1, based on the largest and most recent RCT. Response was defined as a reduction of at least 50 % in the depression scale score. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria, comprising 655 patients. In the overall population, ketamine was not non-inferior to ECT in response rate (RD -0.10; 95 % CI -0.26 to 0.05; p = 0.198; I = 72 %). The ECT group had a higher reduction in depression scores, but without difference in remission and relapse rates. Regarding safety outcomes, ketamine had better posttreatment cognition scores and reduced muscle pain rate compared with ECT, albeit with an increased rate of dissociative symptoms. In a subanalysis with only inpatients, ketamine was inferior to ECT in response rate (RD -0.15; 95 % CI -0.27 to -0.03; p = 0.014; I = 25 %), remission, and change in depression scores. These findings support the use of ECT over ketamine for inpatients. Further RCTs are warranted to clarify the comparative effect of these treatments for outpatients.
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查氯胺酮与电抽搐治疗(ECT)治疗重度抑郁发作(MDE)的比较效果。系统地检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,以查找比较氯胺酮和 ECT 治疗 MDE 的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是反应率,我们根据最大和最新的 RCT 预设了-0.1 的非劣效性边界。反应定义为抑郁量表评分至少降低 50%。符合纳入标准的 6 项 RCT 共纳入 655 例患者。在总体人群中,氯胺酮在反应率方面并不劣于 ECT(RD-0.10;95%CI-0.26 至 0.05;p=0.198;I=72%)。ECT 组的抑郁评分降低幅度更大,但缓解率和复发率无差异。关于安全性结局,氯胺酮治疗后认知评分较好,肌肉疼痛发生率较低,但分离症状发生率较高。在仅包括住院患者的亚分析中,氯胺酮在反应率(RD-0.15;95%CI-0.27 至-0.03;p=0.014;I=25%)、缓解率和抑郁评分变化方面劣于 ECT。这些发现支持在住院患者中使用 ECT 而不是氯胺酮。需要进一步的 RCT 来阐明这些治疗方法对门诊患者的比较效果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-29
N Engl J Med. 2023-6-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Front Psychiatry. 2025-6-16
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2025-4
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025-1-10