Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌症患者护理质量的保险差异。

Insurance Disparities in Quality of Care Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug 1;150(8):641-650. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1338.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Significant insurance status disparities have been demonstrated in head and neck cancer (HNC) outcomes. The effects of insurance status on HNC outcomes may be explained by differential access to high-quality care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of insurance status with the quality of the treating hospital and receipt of guideline-compliant care among patients with HNC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study of data from the California Cancer Registry dataset linked with discharge records and hospital characteristics from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information included adult patients with HNC diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from May 10, 2023, to March 25, 2024.

EXPOSURES

Insurance status: commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured, other, or unknown.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Quality of the treating hospital (tertiles), receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-compliant care, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 23 933 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.8 [12.3] years; 75.3% male) met the inclusion criteria. Treatment in top-tertile hospitals (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) was associated with improved overall survival compared with treatment in bottom-tertile hospitals. Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84), Medicaid (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54-0.66), and uninsured (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29-0.49) status were associated with lower likelihood of treatment in high-quality hospitals compared with commercial insurance. Among patients with advanced disease, Medicaid (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.83) and uninsured (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93) patients were less likely to receive dual-modality therapy. Among patients with surgically resected advanced disease, Medicaid coverage (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93) was associated with lower likelihood of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found significant insurance disparities in quality of care among patients with HNC. These findings highlight the need for continued health insurance reform in the US to improve the quality of insurance coverage, in addition to expanding access to health insurance.

摘要

重要性

已证明在头颈部癌症(HNC)的结果中存在显著的保险状况差异。保险状况对 HNC 结果的影响可能是由于获得高质量护理的差异造成的。

目的

评估保险状况与 HNC 患者治疗医院的质量以及是否符合指南的护理之间的关系。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究的数据来自加利福尼亚癌症登记处的数据,与加利福尼亚州卫生保健获取和信息部的出院记录和医院特征相关联,包括 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断为 HNC 的成年患者。数据分析于 2023 年 5 月 10 日至 2024 年 3 月 25 日进行。

暴露情况

保险状况:商业保险、医疗保险、医疗补助、无保险、其他或未知。

主要结果和测量

治疗医院的质量(三分位数)、接受国家综合癌症网络指南一致的护理、总生存率。

结果

共有 23933 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,64.8[12.3]岁;75.3%为男性)符合纳入标准。与在底三分位数医院治疗相比,在顶三分位数医院治疗(风险比,0.87;95%CI,0.79-0.95)与总体生存率提高相关。医疗保险(比值比[OR],0.78;95%CI,0.73-0.84)、医疗补助(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.54-0.66)和无保险(OR,0.38;95%CI,0.29-0.49)状况与在高质量医院治疗的可能性降低相关商业保险。在患有晚期疾病的患者中,医疗补助(OR,0.72;95%CI,0.62-0.83)和无保险(OR,0.64;95%CI,0.44-0.93)患者接受双模式治疗的可能性较低。在接受手术切除的晚期疾病患者中,医疗补助覆盖(OR,0.73;95%CI,0.58-0.93)与接受辅助放疗的可能性降低相关。

结论和相关性

本研究发现 HNC 患者在护理质量方面存在显著的保险差异。这些发现强调了美国需要继续进行健康保险改革,以提高保险覆盖的质量,同时扩大获得健康保险的机会。

相似文献

1
Insurance Disparities in Quality of Care Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症患者护理质量的保险差异。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug 1;150(8):641-650. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1338.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验