Suppr超能文献

增强糖尿病管理:患者与医护人员协作通过自主性支持和共同决策对2型糖尿病治疗结果的影响。

Empowering diabetes management: The impact of patient-provider collaboration on type 2 diabetes outcomes through autonomy support and shared decision-making.

作者信息

Freeman-Hildreth Yolonda, Aron David, Cola Philip A, Jr Richard Boland, Wang Yunmei

机构信息

College of Health Professions, University of Detroit-Mercy, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Oct;127:108348. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108348. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Through the lens of self-determination theory, this quantitative study investigates how patient-provider collaboration through perceived shared decision-making (SDM) and autonomy support impact type 2 diabetes (T2D) outcomes.

METHODS

We sampled 474 individuals over 18 years old who self-identified as having T2D. Completed and valid responses were received from 378 participants from two separate groups in an online survey. Data was analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), AMOS package, version 28, and Mplus, version 8.8.

RESULTS

Patient-provider collaboration through autonomy support improved treatment satisfaction (β = .16, ρ < .05) and self-management adherence (β = .43, ρ < .001). While collaboration through SDM improved treatment satisfaction (β = .25, ρ < .01), it worsened SM adherence (β = -.31, ρ < .001). The negative impact of SDM on self-management adherence was mitigated by our moderator, coping ability. However, coping ability minimally impacted treatment satisfaction and SM adherence when autonomous support was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Autonomy support increases treatment satisfaction and self-management adherence. SDM enhances treatment satisfaction but may adversely affect self-management adherence. The study also suggests that coping ability can mitigate the negative effect of SDM on self-management adherence, although its influence is limited when autonomy support is provided by the provider.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

For providers, SDM and autonomy support permits shared power over treatment decisions while fostering independence over self-management tasks. Providers should evaluate patients' coping ability and adapt their approach to care based on the patient's coping capacity.

摘要

目的

本定量研究从自我决定理论的视角出发,探讨通过感知到的共同决策(SDM)和自主支持实现的医患合作如何影响2型糖尿病(T2D)的治疗结果。

方法

我们对474名18岁以上自我认定患有T2D的个体进行了抽样。在一项在线调查中,来自两个独立组的378名参与者给出了完整且有效的回答。数据使用IBM社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)、版本为28 的AMOS软件包和版本为8.8的Mplus进行分析。

结果

通过自主支持实现的医患合作提高了治疗满意度(β = 0.16,ρ < 0.05)和自我管理依从性(β = 0.43,ρ < 0.001)。虽然通过SDM实现的合作提高了治疗满意度(β = 0.25,ρ < 0.01),但却降低了自我管理依从性(β = -0.31,ρ < 0.001)。我们的调节变量应对能力减轻了SDM对自我管理依从性的负面影响。然而,当提供自主支持时,应对能力对治疗满意度和自我管理依从性的影响极小。

结论

自主支持可提高治疗满意度和自我管理依从性。SDM可提高治疗满意度,但可能对自我管理依从性产生不利影响。该研究还表明,应对能力可减轻SDM对自我管理依从性的负面影响,尽管当提供者提供自主支持时其影响有限。

实际意义

对于提供者而言,SDM和自主支持在赋予治疗决策共享权力的同时,促进了自我管理任务的独立性。提供者应评估患者的应对能力,并根据患者的应对能力调整其护理方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验