• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西长期护理机构运营面临的挑战及监管变化。

Challenges to the operation of Brazilian LTCIs and changes in oversight.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Gerontologia. Brasília, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05129-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05129-4
PMID:38872159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite 18 years since health surveillance regulations were promulgated in Brazil to govern Long-Term Care Institutions for Older Adults (LTCIs), many institutions fail to comply with the Differentiated Regime for Public Procurement (Resolution No. 502/2021) due to structural and operational conditions. This study aimed to investigate Brazilian LTCI managers' understanding of challenges that significantly impact institutional operation and gather suggestions for enhancing RDC No. 502/21.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, exploratory, and qualitative study was conducted, involving 90 managers or technical supervisors from Brazilian LTCIs. Data were collected using a self-administered Google Forms instrument and analyzed through Thematic Analysis based on the Organizing for Quality (OQ) framework.

RESULTS

The most impactful challenges for LTCIs were healthcare, financing, human resources, relationship with oversight bodies, and family members.

DISCUSSION

Proposed improvements for RDC No. 502/21 included enhanced professional training, infrastructure revision, increased financial support from the state, realistic oversight/regulations, and tailored monitoring approaches.

CONCLUSION

LTCIs in Brazil face numerous challenges, and the suggested improvements aim to adapt regulations to institutional realities. However, considering the regulations' variability and purposes, further investigation is warranted.

摘要

背景

尽管巴西自 18 年前颁布了健康监测法规来管理老年人长期护理机构(LTCIs),但由于结构和运营条件,许多机构未能遵守差异化公共采购制度(第 502/2021 号决议)。本研究旨在调查巴西 LTCI 经理对影响机构运营的重大挑战的理解,并收集有关加强 RDC 第 502/21 号决议的建议。

方法

本研究采用了横断面、探索性和定性研究方法,涉及 90 名来自巴西 LTCIs 的经理或技术主管。使用 Google Forms 工具进行了自我管理的问卷调查,并通过基于组织质量(OQ)框架的主题分析进行了数据分析。

结果

对 LTCIs 影响最大的挑战是医疗保健、融资、人力资源、与监督机构的关系以及家庭成员。

讨论

对 RDC 第 502/21 号决议的改进建议包括加强专业培训、基础设施修订、增加国家财政支持、现实的监督/规定以及量身定制的监测方法。

结论

巴西的 LTCIs 面临着许多挑战,建议的改进旨在使法规适应机构的实际情况。然而,考虑到法规的多样性和目的,需要进一步的调查。

相似文献

1
Challenges to the operation of Brazilian LTCIs and changes in oversight.巴西长期护理机构运营面临的挑战及监管变化。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05129-4.
2
Analysis of the theme of violence in policies of long-term care for the elderly.老年人长期护理政策中的暴力主题分析
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Aug 5;24(8):2859-2870. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018248.25192017.
3
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为照顾居住在长期护理机构中的60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 2;2016(6):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub5.
4
Perceptions of older adults living in long-term care institutions regarding recreational physiotherapy: a qualitative study.长期护理机构中老年人对娱乐性物理治疗的看法:一项定性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Jan;38(1):67-75. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1728795. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.为在长期护理机构中照顾60岁及以上老人的医护人员接种流感疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 22(7):CD005187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub4.
6
Depression and empathy in health professionals who work in the long-term care institutions for older adults.在为老年人提供长期护理服务的医疗机构中工作的医护人员的抑郁情绪与同理心。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2021 Jul-Sep;15(3):381-386. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-030011.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
8
Educational Programme on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Oral Care/Hygiene Provision by Healthcare Providers to Older Residents in Long-Term Care Institutions: A Case-Control Study.长期护理机构中医疗服务提供者为老年居民提供口腔护理/卫生知识、态度及实践的教育项目:一项病例对照研究
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Jan 29;9(1):16. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9010016.
9
A qualitative examination of policy and structural factors driving care workers' adverse experiences in long-term residential care facilities for the older adults in Cape Town.对开普敦老年人长期居住护理设施中照顾者不良经历的政策和结构因素进行定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1105-3.
10
Promoting activity and mobility in long-term care environments: A photo-elicitation study with older adults and nurses.促进长期护理环境中的活动和流动性:一项针对老年人和护士的照片引发研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Dec;32(23-24):8078-8094. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16866. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing Homes Required to Reveal Ownership Status Under Proposed Rule.根据拟议规则,疗养院需披露所有权状况。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 21;329(11):875. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.2891.
2
Family involvement in nursing homes: an interpretative synthesis of literature.家庭参与养老院护理:文献的阐释性综合。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1530-1544. doi: 10.1177/09697330221085774. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Reforming Nursing Home Financing, Payment, and Oversight.改革养老院的融资、支付和监管。
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 19;386(20):1869-1871. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2203429. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Formal Caregiver Burden in Nursing Homes: An Integrative Review.养老院中正式护理人员的负担:一项综合综述。
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Sep;43(9):877-893. doi: 10.1177/0193945920979691. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
5
Two Decades of Nursing Home Compare: What Have We Learned?养老院比较二十年:我们学到了什么?
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Aug;78(4):295-310. doi: 10.1177/1077558720931652. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
6
Exploring challenges in quality and safety work in nursing homes and home care - a case study as basis for theory development.探索养老院和家庭护理中的质量和安全工作挑战——以案例研究为基础的理论发展。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05149-x.
7
Nursing home staff's perspective on end-of-life care of German nursing home residents: a cross-sectional survey.养老院工作人员对德国养老院居民临终关怀的看法:一项横断面调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0512-8.
8
Nursing Staff Characteristics on Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes.养老院中护理人员特征对居民结果的影响。
J Nurs Res. 2019 Feb;27(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000269.
9
[Long stay institutions as an alternative for protecting the elderly].[长期护理机构作为保护老年人的一种选择]
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2017 Mar-Apr;19(2):210-214. doi: 10.15446/rsap.v19n2.41541.
10
Comprehensive public health action for our aging world: the quintessence of public health policy.针对我们老龄化世界的全面公共卫生行动:公共卫生政策的精髓。
J Int Med Res. 2018 Feb;46(2):555-556. doi: 10.1177/0300060517718452. Epub 2017 Jul 18.