College of First Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nr. 16369, Jingshi Road, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of Joint Oncology Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Traditional Chinese Medicine University, Nr. 16369, Jingshi Road, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Aug;43(8):2391-2402. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07027-x. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
To explore the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib for managing axial spondyloarthritis. Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were applied to search randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for assessing upadacitinib treatment for axial spondyloarthritis published until January 2024. Five RCTs involving 1,246 participants were included. The upadacitinib group had significantly higher percentages of participants achieving Assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) 20, ASAS40, ASAS partial remission, Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) 50, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) low disease activity, ASDAS inactive disease, ASDAS clinically important improvement, and ASDAS major improvement, except for Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) absenteeism. Obvious improvements were observed in the upadacitinib group for ASDAS (CRP), BASDAI, Modified BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Canadian Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium (SPARCC) MRI spine, SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint, Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoLS), ASAS Health Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES), Total Back Pain, Nocturnal Back Pain, WPAI overall work impairment, WPAI presenteeism, and WPAI activity impairment. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) incidence rates showed no significant difference differ between upadacitinib and placebo groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that disease subtype and age did not significantly affect efficacy, and upadacitinib demonstrated comparable efficacy to adalimumab for axial spondyloarthritis. Upadacitinib exhibited satisfactory efficacy in treating axial spondyloarthritis, reducing disease activity and significantly enhancing patients' physical function, emotional well-being, and social engagement. This meta-analysis offers robust evidence supporting upadacitinib as a new treatment for axial spondyloarthritis patients.
探讨乌帕替尼治疗轴性脊柱关节炎的有效性和安全性。检索了截至 2024 年 1 月发表的评估乌帕替尼治疗轴性脊柱关节炎的随机对照试验(RCT),使用了 4 个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 Web of Science)。纳入了 5 项涉及 1246 名参与者的 RCT。乌帕替尼组有更高比例的患者达到了评估强直性脊柱炎国际协会(ASAS)20、ASAS40、ASAS 部分缓解、Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)50、强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)低疾病活动度、ASDAS 无疾病活动、ASDAS 临床重要改善和 ASDAS 主要改善,除了工作生产力和活动障碍(WPAI)旷工。乌帕替尼组的 ASDAS(CRP)、BASDAI、改良 BASDAI、Bath 强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)、加拿大脊柱关节炎研究联合会(SPARCC)脊柱 MRI、SPARCC 骶髂关节 MRI、强直性脊柱炎生活质量(ASQoLS)、ASAS 健康指数、Bath 强直性脊柱炎计量指数(BASMI)、马斯特里赫特强直性脊柱炎附着点炎评分(MASES)、总背痛、夜间背痛、WPAI 总体工作障碍、WPAI 到职率和 WPAI 活动障碍等方面均有明显改善。乌帕替尼组和安慰剂组的不良反应(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE)发生率无显著差异。亚组分析显示,疾病亚型和年龄对疗效没有显著影响,乌帕替尼治疗轴性脊柱关节炎的疗效与阿达木单抗相当。乌帕替尼治疗轴性脊柱关节炎疗效满意,能降低疾病活动度,显著改善患者的身体功能、情绪健康和社会参与度。这项荟萃分析提供了强有力的证据,支持乌帕替尼作为一种新的轴性脊柱关节炎治疗药物。