Centre for Rheumatology, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Aug;6(8):e546-e559. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00097-3. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
Active inflammatory arthritis in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Treatment of active inflammation and maintenance of low disease activity with medication reduces these risks. Therapeutic decisions on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in pregnancy are complicated by safety concerns, which have led to inappropriate withdrawal of treatment and consequential harm to mother and fetus. Studies of inflammatory arthritis in pregnancy have consistently shown minimal safety concerns with the use of biological DMARDs and an increased risk of disease flare with discontinuation of biological DMARDs. It is our opinion that during pregnancy, the benefits of disease control with biological DMARDs, when required in addition to conventional synthetic DMARDs, outweigh the risks. In this Series paper, we review the reasons for reconsideration of equipoise and propose an agenda for future research to optimise the use of biological DMARDs in inflammatory arthritis during pregnancy.
妊娠期活动性炎症性关节炎与不良妊娠结局风险增加相关。用药物治疗活动性炎症和维持低疾病活动度可降低这些风险。由于安全性问题,妊娠期对疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的治疗决策变得复杂,这导致了治疗的不恰当中断,进而对母亲和胎儿造成伤害。妊娠期炎症性关节炎的研究一致表明,生物 DMARDs 的使用安全性极小,且停止使用生物 DMARDs 会增加疾病发作的风险。我们认为,在妊娠期间,当需要联合传统合成 DMARDs 时,生物 DMARDs 控制疾病的益处大于风险。在本系列论文中,我们回顾了重新考虑平衡状态的原因,并提出了未来研究的议程,以优化妊娠期炎症性关节炎中生物 DMARDs 的使用。