Suppr超能文献

超声引导与解剖标志引导下神经轴突穿刺的有效性和安全性:一项随机临床试验的系统评价、网状Meta分析和试验序贯分析

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided neuraxial puncture: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

de Carvalho Clístenes Crístian, Porto Genuino Willgney, Vieira Morais Maria Clara, de Paiva Oliveira Heleno, Rodrigues Adolfo Igor, El-Boghdadly Kariem

机构信息

Academic Unit of Medicine, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil

Real Hospital Português, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jun 14. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105547.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data suggest that preprocedural ultrasound may improve the efficacy of central neuraxial puncture. However, it remains uncertain whether these findings can be extended to various clinical scenarios, including diverse patient populations and the application of real-time ultrasound guidance. Additionally, it is unclear whether ultrasound-guided techniques improve safety and patient-centered outcomes.

METHODS

We searched six databases for randomized trials of adult patients undergoing neuraxial puncture, comparing real-time ultrasound, preprocedural ultrasound, and landmark palpation for efficacy, safety and patient-centered outcomes. Our primary outcome was a failed first-attempt neuraxial puncture. After two-person screening and data extraction, meta-analyses were conducted and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was applied to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Analysis of 71 studies involving 7153 patients, both real-time ultrasound (OR 0.30; 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.15 to 0.58; low certainty) and preprocedural ultrasound (OR 0.33; 95% CrI 0.24 to 0.44; moderate certainty) showed a significant reduction in the risk of a failed first neuraxial puncture. Real-time ultrasound had the best performance for preventing first-attempt failures (low certainty evidence). Although real-time ultrasound was also the leading method for reducing the risk of complete neuraxial puncture failure, the results did not show a statistically significant difference when compared with landmark palpation. Preprocedural ultrasound, however, significantly reduced the odds of complete puncture failure (OR 0.29; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.61). These ultrasound-guided approaches also contributed to a reduction in certain complications and increased patient satisfaction without any other significant differences in additional outcomes. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that sufficient information was achieved for our primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided neuraxial puncture improves efficacy, reduces puncture attempts and needle redirections, reduces complication risks, and increases patient satisfaction, with low to moderate certainty of evidence. Despite real-time ultrasound's high ranking, a clear superiority over preprocedural ultrasound is not established. These results could prompt anesthesiologists and other clinicians to reassess their neuraxial puncture techniques.

摘要

背景

数据表明,术前超声检查可能会提高中枢神经轴突穿刺的成功率。然而,这些研究结果能否推广到包括不同患者群体和实时超声引导应用在内的各种临床场景,仍不明确。此外,尚不清楚超声引导技术是否能提高安全性和以患者为中心的治疗效果。

方法

我们检索了六个数据库,以查找接受神经轴突穿刺的成年患者的随机试验,比较实时超声、术前超声和体表标志触诊在疗效、安全性和以患者为中心的治疗效果方面的差异。我们的主要结局是首次神经轴突穿刺失败。经过双人筛查和数据提取后,进行了荟萃分析,并采用推荐分级的评估、制定和评价方法来评估证据的确定性。

结果

对涉及7153例患者的71项研究进行分析,实时超声(比值比[OR]0.30;95%可信区间[CrI]0.15至0.58;低确定性)和术前超声(OR 0.33;95% CrI 0.24至0.44;中等确定性)均显示首次神经轴突穿刺失败的风险显著降低。实时超声在预防首次穿刺失败方面表现最佳(低确定性证据)。虽然实时超声也是降低神经轴突完全穿刺失败风险的主要方法,但与体表标志触诊相比,结果未显示出统计学上的显著差异。然而,术前超声显著降低了完全穿刺失败的几率(OR 0.29;95% CrI 0.11至0.61)。这些超声引导方法还有助于减少某些并发症并提高患者满意度,在其他结局方面没有任何其他显著差异。试验序贯分析证实我们的主要结局已获得足够信息。

结论

超声引导下的神经轴突穿刺可提高疗效,减少穿刺尝试次数和针头重新定位,降低并发症风险,并提高患者满意度,证据确定性低至中等。尽管实时超声排名靠前,但未确立其明显优于术前超声。这些结果可能促使麻醉医生和其他临床医生重新评估他们的神经轴突穿刺技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验