Suppr超能文献

评估用于通过输血预防基孔肯雅热和登革热病毒传播的核酸检测方法。

Evaluation of assays for nucleic acid testing for the prevention of chikungunya and dengue virus transmission by blood transfusion.

机构信息

Etablissement Français du Sang, La Plaine Saint Denis, France.

Unité des Virus Emergents (UVE: Aix-Marseille Univ-IRD 190-Inserm 1207), Marseille, France.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2024 Aug;64(8):1503-1508. doi: 10.1111/trf.17921. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The large dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) outbreaks observed during the last decade across the world, as well as local transmissions in non-endemic areas are a growing concern for blood safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the sensitivity of nucleic acid tests (NAT) detecting DENV and CHIKV RNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using DENV 1 to 4 International Standards, the limits of detection (LODs) calculated by probit analysis of two NAT assays; the cobas CHIKV/DENV assay (Roche Diagnostics) and the Procleix Dengue Virus Assay (Grifols) were compared. In addition, CHIKV-RNA LOD of the cobas CHIKV/DENV assay was evaluated.

RESULTS

For dengue, the 95% LOD of the cobas assay ranged between 4.10 [CI95%: 2.70-8.19] IU/mL (DENV-2) and 7.07 [CI95%: 4.34-14.89] IU/mL (DENV-4), and between 2.19 [CI95%: 1.53-3.83] IU/mL (DENV-3) and 5.84 [CI95%: 3.84-10.77] IU/mL (DENV-1) for Procleix assay. The Procleix assay had a significant lower LOD for DENV-3 (2.19 vs. 5.89 IU/mL) when compared to the cobas assay (p = 0.005). The 95% LOD for CHIKV-RNA detection of the cobas assay was 4.76 [CI95%: 3.08-8.94] IU/mL.

DISCUSSION

The two NAT assays developed for blood donor screening evaluated in this study demonstrated high and similar analytical performance. Subject to an appropriate risk-benefit assessment, they can be used to support blood safety during outbreaks in endemic areas or in non-endemic areas as an alternative to deferring blood donors during local transmission likely to affect the blood supply. The development of multiplex assays is expected to optimize laboratory organization.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,世界各地发生了大规模的登革热(DENV)和基孔肯雅热(CHIKV)疫情,以及非流行地区的本地传播,这对血液安全构成了日益严重的威胁。本研究旨在评估和比较两种核酸检测(NAT)检测 DENV 和 CHIKV RNA 的灵敏度。

材料与方法

使用 DENV 1 至 4 国际标准,通过对两种 NAT 检测方法;罗氏诊断 cobas CHIKV/DENV 检测(cobas CHIKV/DENV 检测)和 Grifols Procleix Dengue Virus Assay(Procleix Dengue Virus Assay)的概率分析,计算出检测限(LOD)。此外,还评估了 cobas CHIKV/DENV 检测的 CHIKV-RNA LOD。

结果

对于登革热,cobas 检测的 95% LOD 范围为 4.10[95%CI:2.70-8.19]IU/ml(DENV-2)和 7.07[95%CI:4.34-14.89]IU/ml(DENV-4),Procleix 检测为 2.19[95%CI:1.53-3.83]IU/ml(DENV-3)和 5.84[95%CI:3.84-10.77]IU/ml(DENV-1)。与 cobas 检测相比,Procleix 检测对 DENV-3 的 LOD 显著降低(2.19 对 5.89 IU/ml)(p=0.005)。cobas 检测检测 CHIKV-RNA 的 95% LOD 为 4.76[95%CI:3.08-8.94]IU/ml。

讨论

本研究评估的两种用于献血者筛查的 NAT 检测方法均表现出高且相似的分析性能。在适当的风险效益评估的基础上,它们可用于支持流行地区或非流行地区的血液安全,也可作为在可能影响血液供应的本地传播期间推迟献血者的替代方法。预计多重检测方法的开发将优化实验室组织。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验