Olivia D. Chang, MSW, LLMSW, is a doctoral student, School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kaitlin P. Ward, PhD, LCSW, is research affiliate, School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Health Soc Work. 2024 Aug 1;49(3):175-184. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlae018.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, studies documented a marked decline in mental health and well-being when compared with prepandemic levels. This study examined how different coping styles were associated with anxiety, depression, and sleep problems among U.S. adults March-April 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from 535 U.S. adults across three time points were analyzed using longitudinal multilevel logistic and linear regression modeling. Avoidant-emotional coping was associated with greater odds of experiencing anxiety (OR = 1.65, p < .001). Both avoidant- and active-emotional coping were associated with greater odds of experiencing depression (OR = 1.67, p < .001, and OR = 1.09, p = .022, respectively) and sleep problems (b = 0.05, p < .001, and b = 0.01, p = .005, respectively). Alternatively, problem-focused coping was associated with lower odds of depression (OR = 0.86, p < .001). Results converge with previous evidence suggesting the perniciousness of avoidant-emotional coping during the pandemic, but also underscore that problem-focused coping strategies may represent one important source of resilience for adults to adapt despite such challenges.
在 COVID-19 大流行早期,与流行前水平相比,研究记录了心理健康和幸福感的显著下降。本研究调查了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国成年人在 2020 年 3 月至 4 月期间,不同的应对方式与焦虑、抑郁和睡眠问题之间的关系。使用纵向多层逻辑回归和线性回归模型对来自三个时间点的 535 名美国成年人的数据进行了分析。避免情感应对与焦虑的可能性更大相关(OR = 1.65,p <.001)。避免和主动情感应对均与抑郁的可能性更大相关(OR = 1.67,p <.001,和 OR = 1.09,p =.022,分别)和睡眠问题(b = 0.05,p <.001,和 b = 0.01,p =.005,分别)。相反,问题聚焦应对与抑郁的可能性较低相关(OR = 0.86,p <.001)。研究结果与先前的证据一致,表明在大流行期间避免情感应对的危害性,但也强调问题聚焦应对策略可能是成年人在面临这些挑战时适应的一个重要韧性来源。