Yang Grace Meijuan, Lee Yixuan, Ke Yu, Neo Patricia Soek Hui, Cheung Yin Bun
Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (G.M.Y., Y.K., P.S.H.N., Y.B.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Lien Centre for Palliative Care (G.M.Y., Y.K., P.S.H.N., Y.B.), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; Programme in Health Services and Systems Research (G.M.Y., Y.K., P.S.H.N., Y.B.), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School (Y.L.), Singapore, Singapore.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Sep;68(3):e174-e182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
Patients with advanced cancer may experience symptoms and concerns that are inadequately identified by the healthcare team, leading to calls for patient-reported symptom monitoring.
Assess the feasibility of administering weekly patient-reported online Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) questionnaires within the context of a stepped care model in the outpatient care setting.
Analysis of intervention group data in a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a stepped care model of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Patients in the intervention group were invited to complete the IPOS weekly for 16 weeks through a remotely-administered online questionnaire. At the end of the 16-week period, patients were invited to complete a feedback survey. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with more versus less than 70% completion of weekly questionnaires.
Among 111 patients who survived more than 16 weeks, the mean number of questionnaires completed was 9.2/16 (58%). A total of 53 out of the 111 patients (48%) completed more than 70% of the questionnaires. Higher education level was found to be associated with higher completion of the questionnaires. A total of 79 out of 111 (71%) patients responded to the feedback survey, of which 67 (85%) felt comfortable with completing the online questionnaire and 11 (14%) felt it was troublesome to complete it on a weekly basis.
In our study, there was suboptimal completion of patient-reported IPOS questionnaire. Further research is needed to improve the uptake of patient-reported outcomes in real-world clinical settings.
晚期癌症患者可能会出现一些症状和担忧,但医疗团队对此识别不足,因此需要患者报告症状监测。
评估在门诊护理环境中的分级护理模式下,每周让患者报告在线综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS)问卷的可行性。
对一项随机对照试验中的干预组数据进行分析,以评估姑息治疗分级护理模式对晚期癌症患者的有效性。干预组的患者被邀请通过远程管理的在线问卷,每周完成IPOS问卷,为期16周。在16周结束时,邀请患者完成一份反馈调查。采用多变量逻辑回归分析与每周问卷完成率超过70%或低于70%相关的因素。
在111名存活超过16周的患者中,问卷完成的平均数量为9.2/16(58%)。111名患者中有53名(48%)完成了超过70%的问卷。发现较高的教育水平与较高的问卷完成率相关。111名患者中有79名(71%)回复了反馈调查,其中67名(85%)对完成在线问卷感到满意,11名(14%)觉得每周完成问卷很麻烦。
在我们的研究中,患者报告的IPOS问卷完成情况不理想。需要进一步研究以提高现实临床环境中患者报告结果的接受度。