Suppr超能文献

在中国,添加到标准治疗中的非奈利酮对慢性肾脏病和 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of Finerenone in Addition to Standard of Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in China.

机构信息

Real World Solutions, IQVIA China, Shanghai, China.

School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2024 Aug;41(8):3138-3158. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02906-w. Epub 2024 Jun 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adding finerenone to current standard of care (SoC), as recommended by Chinese guidelines, has shown substantial benefit in delaying chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the landmark FIDELIO-DKD trial. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of finerenone + SoC versus SoC alone among Chinese patients with T2D and CKD from a healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model (FINE-CKD) has been developed and published, with health states defined for CKD stages (CKD 1/2, CKD 3, CKD 4, and CKD 5 without renal replacement therapy (RRT), dialysis, or transplant) and cardiovascular event history. Additionally, the model also considered adverse events. Transition probabilities and event risks were derived using patient-level data from Asian population analysis of FIDELIO-DKD. Since the price of finerenone after the national reimbursement drug list (NRDL) inclusion was confidential, the cost of finerenone in the model was assumed to be the same as that of SoC. Other health resource costs were gathered from literature and supplemented by physician interviews. Measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, quality of life was translated into utilities based on the Chinese EQ-5D-5L value set.

RESULTS

Discounted at 5.0% annually, over a lifetime horizon, finerenone + SoC resulted in a quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain of 0.321 versus SoC alone (8.660 vs. 8.338 QALYs), due to a reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular events and dialysis. Total costs per patient were lower under finerenone + SoC than SoC alone (381,130 CNY vs. 392,390 CNY). As a result, finerenone + SoC was a dominant treatment strategy compared with SoC alone. Sensitivity analysis has confirmed the robustness of this study.

CONCLUSION

Adding finerenone to SoC was likely to be either a dominant or cost-effective treatment option compared with SoC alone in Chinese patients with CKD and T2D.

摘要

简介

根据中国指南的建议,在现行标准治疗(SOC)的基础上添加非奈利酮,在 FIDELIO-DKD 试验中,可显著延缓慢性肾脏病(CKD)的进展,并降低 CKD 和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的心血管风险。本研究旨在从医疗保健系统的角度评估非奈利酮+SOC 对比 SOC 单药治疗在中国 T2D 和 CKD 患者中的成本效果。

方法

已建立并发表了一个成本效果模型(FINE-CKD),其中定义了 CKD 各阶段(CKD 1/2、CKD 3、CKD 4 和 CKD 5 但未进行肾脏替代治疗(RRT)、透析或移植)和心血管事件史的健康状态。此外,该模型还考虑了不良事件。使用 FIDELIO-DKD 亚洲人群分析中的患者水平数据得出转移概率和事件风险。由于非奈利酮在国家医保药品目录(NRDL)纳入后的价格保密,模型中的非奈利酮成本假设与 SOC 相同。其他卫生资源成本则来自文献,并通过医生访谈进行补充。采用 EQ-5D-5L 问卷进行衡量,生活质量根据中国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集转化为效用。

结果

在终生的时间范围内,以 5.0%的贴现率计算,与 SOC 单药治疗相比,非奈利酮+SOC 可使质量调整生命年(QALY)增加 0.321(8.660 与 8.338 QALY),这归因于心血管事件和透析发生率的降低。与 SOC 单药治疗相比,非奈利酮+SOC 下每位患者的总费用更低(381,130 人民币与 392,390 人民币)。因此,与 SOC 单药治疗相比,非奈利酮+SOC 是一种更优的治疗策略。敏感性分析证实了本研究的稳健性。

结论

与 SOC 单药治疗相比,在中国 CKD 和 T2D 患者中,SOC 基础上加用非奈利酮可能是一种更优的治疗选择,或者具有成本效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验