Diehl Thomas, Jaraczewski Taylor J, Ahmed Kaleem Sohail, Khan Muhammad Rizwan, Harrison Ewen M, Abebe Belay Mellese, Latif Asad, Mughal Nabiha, Khan Sadaf, McQueen K A Kelly, Tefera Girma, Zafar Syed Nabeel
From the Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Feb 13;5(1):e384. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000384. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Perioperative data are essential to improve the safety of surgical care. However, surgical outcome research (SOR) from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is disproportionately sparse. We aimed to assess practices, barriers, facilitators, and perceptions influencing the collection and use of surgical outcome data (SOD) in LMICs.
An internet-based survey was developed and disseminated to stakeholders involved in the care of surgical patients in LMICs. The Performance of Routine Information Systems Management framework was used to explore the frequency and relative importance of organizational, technical, and behavioral barriers. Associations were determined using and ANOVA analyses.
Final analysis included 229 surgeons, anesthesia providers, nurses, and administrators from 36 separate LMICs. A total of 58.1% of individuals reported that their institution had experience with collection of SOD and 73% of these reported a positive impact on patient care. Mentorship and research training was available in <50% of respondent's institutions; however, those who had these were more likely to publish SOD ( = 0.02). Sixteen barriers met the threshold for significance of which the top 3 were the burden of clinical responsibility, research costs, and accuracy of medical documentation. The most frequently proposed solutions were the availability of an electronic data collection platform (95.3%), dedicated research personnel (93.2%), and access to research training (93.2%).
There are several barriers and facilitators to collection of SOD that are common across LMICs. Most of these can be addressed through targeted interventions and are highlighted in this study. We provide a path towards advancing SOR in LMICs.
围手术期数据对于提高手术治疗的安全性至关重要。然而,来自低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的手术结果研究(SOR)极为稀少。我们旨在评估影响LMICs手术结果数据(SOD)收集和使用的实践、障碍、促进因素及看法。
开发了一项基于互联网的调查,并分发给LMICs参与手术患者护理的利益相关者。使用常规信息系统管理框架的绩效来探讨组织、技术和行为障碍的频率及相对重要性。使用卡方检验和方差分析确定关联。
最终分析纳入了来自36个不同LMICs的229名外科医生、麻醉提供者、护士和管理人员。共有58.1%的受访者表示其所在机构有收集SOD的经验,其中73%报告对患者护理有积极影响。不到50%的受访者所在机构提供指导和研究培训;然而,有这些的机构更有可能发表SOD(P = 0.02)。16个障碍达到显著阈值,其中前3个是临床责任负担、研究成本和医疗文件的准确性。最常提出的解决方案是提供电子数据收集平台(95.3%)、专职研究人员(93.2%)和获得研究培训(93.2%)。
LMICs在收集SOD方面存在一些常见的障碍和促进因素。其中大多数可通过有针对性的干预措施解决,本研究对此进行了强调。我们为推进LMICs的SOR提供了一条途径。