Suppr超能文献

TikTok气管造口术视频的质量、可信度和可读性分析。

TikTok Tracheostomy Video Analysis of Quality, Credibility, and Readability.

作者信息

Galantini Gianfranco, Samarrai Ruwaa, Hughes Amy, Kavanagh Katherine

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60548. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60548. eCollection 2024 May.

Abstract

Objective The goal of this study is to analyze the quality, credibility, and readability of videos on TikTok related to tracheostomy in order to assess the adequacy of the information for patient and parental education purposes. Study design This was a cross-sectional analysis of online content. Methods The social media platform TikTok was explored for videos related to tracheostomy. The search function was utilized with multiple hashtags related to tracheostomy and videos were reviewed and scored for quality, credibility, and readability. Each of the videos was assessed using the DISCERN criteria, JAMA benchmark, and readability score based on text either presented in the video or written in the caption. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for each of the studied parameters. Results The TikTok search bar was queried using multiple hashtags, including "#trach," "#tracheostomy," "#trachea," and "#tracheotomy" for relevant videos from October 14 to October 15, 2021. Overall, 60 videos were selected for complete review and analysis. The total views for all related videos analyzed was 17,712,281. The total likes were 693,812. The videos were primarily posted by non-healthcare professionals making up approximately 72% of all videos. Videos created by physicians generated 63% of all views. The average DISCERN score for each video was 24.83 out of 75. The average Flesch Reading Ease score was 70.59 and the average Flesch-Kincaid Grade level was 5.5. There was a positive DISCERN score and views with R = 0.255 (p = 0.049), positive correlation between DISCERN and likes R = 0.334 (p = 0.009), positive correlation between DISCERN and JAMA R = 0.56 (p=<0.0001), positive correlation between DISCERN and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level R = 0.330 (p=0.010) and a negative correlation between DISCERN and Flesch Reading Ease Score R = -0.337 (p=0.009). There was also a statistically significant positive correlation between JAMA and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level R = 0.260 (p=0.045). Conclusion Overall, the quality of the videos on TikTok regarding tracheostomy rated poorly on the DISCERN quality index but included text that was fairly easy to read. Currently, medical videos on TikTok do not meet the quality metrics needed to properly educate the public and should not be used as a primary resource.

摘要

目的 本研究的目的是分析TikTok上与气管造口术相关视频的质量、可信度和可读性,以评估这些信息用于患者及家长教育的充分性。

研究设计 这是一项对在线内容的横断面分析。

方法 在社交媒体平台TikTok上搜索与气管造口术相关的视频。利用搜索功能,使用多个与气管造口术相关的主题标签,对视频进行审查,并对质量、可信度和可读性进行评分。每个视频都根据视频中呈现的文本或字幕中的文本,使用DISCERN标准、《美国医学会杂志》基准和可读性分数进行评估。计算每个研究参数的皮尔逊相关系数。

结果 2021年10月14日至10月15日,使用多个主题标签,包括“#trach”、“#tracheostomy”、“#trachea”和“#tracheotomy”,在TikTok搜索栏中查询相关视频。总体而言,选择了60个视频进行全面审查和分析。所有分析的相关视频的总观看次数为17712281次。总点赞数为693812次。这些视频主要由非医疗专业人员发布,约占所有视频的72%。医生创建的视频产生了所有观看次数的63%。每个视频的平均DISCERN评分为75分中的24.83分。平均弗莱什易读性分数为70.59,平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平为5.5。DISCERN评分与观看次数呈正相关,R = 0.255(p = 0.049),DISCERN与点赞数呈正相关,R = 0.334(p = 0.009),DISCERN与《美国医学会杂志》基准呈正相关,R = 0.56(p<0.0001),DISCERN与弗莱什-金凯德年级水平呈正相关,R = 0.330(p = 0.010),DISCERN与弗莱什易读性分数呈负相关,R = -0.337(p = 0.009)。《美国医学会杂志》基准与弗莱什-金凯德年级水平之间也存在统计学上显著的正相关,R = 0.260(p = 0.045)。

结论 总体而言,TikTok上关于气管造口术的视频在DISCERN质量指数上评分较低,但包含的文本相当容易阅读。目前,TikTok上的医学视频不符合正确教育公众所需的质量指标,不应作为主要资源使用。

相似文献

1
TikTok Tracheostomy Video Analysis of Quality, Credibility, and Readability.
Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60548. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60548. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
4
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e39360. doi: 10.2196/39360.
5
Evaluation of TikTok videos on acute pancreatitis: content quality and reliability analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 2;24(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18708-2.
6
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting Content on TikTok.
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Sep 23;49(5):614-616. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756296. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok.
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jun 12;4(3):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100364. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
TikTok: An Opportunity for Antibiotic Education?
Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 26;13(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i4.4916. eCollection 2022.
9
Analyzing the Quality, Reliability, and Educational Value of ACL Rehabilitation Exercises on TikTok: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Dec 21;11(12):23259671231218668. doi: 10.1177/23259671231218668. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis: a content analysis.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Mar 23;25(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00757-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality, Reliability and Accuracy of Hyperthyroidism-Related Content on Social Media Platform TikTok.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Sep;8(5):e70105. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70105.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating YouTube as a source of patient information for pediatric tracheostomy care.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;171:111580. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111580. Epub 2023 May 31.
3
Is TikTok The Next Social Media Frontier for Medicine?
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Oct 21;5(3). doi: 10.1002/aet2.10532. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse From Empirical Findings.
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;9:641673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673. eCollection 2021.
5
Overview of TikTok's most viewed dermatologic content and assessment of its reliability.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jul;85(1):273-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.028. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
6
Acne and social media: A cross-sectional study of content quality on TikTok.
Pediatr Dermatol. 2021 Jan;38(1):336-338. doi: 10.1111/pde.14471. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
Where We Go From Here: Health Misinformation on Social Media.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S273-S275. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305905.
8
TikTok and Its Role in COVID-19 Information Propagation.
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Nov;67(5):730. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.039. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
9
COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages.
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020 Aug 11;34(5):367-369. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111. eCollection 2022 Oct 1.
10
Tracheostomy in Infants and Children.
Respir Care. 2017 Jun;62(6):799-825. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05366.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验