Leibold Adam, Sarikonda Advith, Tecce Eric, Sami Ashmal, Mansoor Ali Daniyal, Thalheimer Sara, Heller Joshua, Prasad Srinivas K, Sharan Ashwini, Jallo Jack, Harrop James, Vaccaro Alexander R, Sivaganesan Ahilan
Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Oper Neurosurg. 2024 Dec 1;27(6):690-697. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001204. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
Endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (ED) is a minimally invasive option for addressing lumbar disk herniations. With the introduction of value-based care systems, assessing the true cost of certain procedures is critical when creating reimbursement models and comparing procedures. Here, we compared the costs of performing a microdiskectomy (MD) and ED using time-driven activity-based costing.
Total cost for the intraoperative episode was calculated using time-driven activity-based costing methodology. Individual costs were obtained by direct observation and electronic medical records and through querying multiple departments (business operations, sterile processing, plant operations, and pharmacy). Timestamps for all involved personnel and material resources were documented. A retrospective analysis was performed on 202 patients who underwent lumbar diskectomy through either MD (n = 167) or ED (n = 35) from 2018 to 2022. Personnel cost was calculated by multiplying the cost per unit time for each personnel type by the length of time spent in the operating room. Supply cost was calculated by aggregating the cost of all individual supplies, from medications to consumables to surgical trays, used during the case. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed comparing the costs between these procedures.
The average intraoperative cost per case for ED and MD was $3915 ± $1025 and $3162 ± $954, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that ED had higher total cost (β-coefficient: $912 ± $281, P = <.01) and supply cost (β-coefficient: $474 ± $155, P = <.01) than MD. When accounting for surgeon as a covariate, however, total cost ( P = .478) and supply cost ( P = .468) differences between ED and MD were negligible.
ED has shown to be a better value option in addressing lumbar disk herniations, mostly because of advantages in perioperative care. Here, we show that when correcting for surgeon-level effects, the cost between the two procedures is statistically insignificant, reaffirming the value provided by ED.
内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(ED)是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的一种微创选择。随着基于价值的医疗系统的引入,在创建报销模式和比较手术时,评估某些手术的真实成本至关重要。在此,我们使用时间驱动作业成本法比较了进行显微椎间盘切除术(MD)和ED的成本。
使用时间驱动作业成本法计算术中阶段的总成本。通过直接观察和电子病历以及查询多个部门(业务运营、无菌处理、工厂运营和药房)获取各项成本。记录所有相关人员和物资资源的时间戳。对2018年至2022年期间通过MD(n = 167)或ED(n = 35)接受腰椎间盘切除术的202例患者进行回顾性分析。人员成本通过将每种人员类型的单位时间成本乘以在手术室花费的时间长度来计算。供应成本通过汇总病例期间使用的所有单个用品的成本来计算,从药物到耗材再到手术托盘。进行单变量和多变量回归分析以比较这些手术之间的成本。
ED和MD每例的平均术中成本分别为3915美元±1025美元和3162美元±954美元。多变量回归分析显示,ED的总成本(β系数:912美元±281美元,P = <.01)和供应成本(β系数:474美元±155美元,P = <.01)高于MD。然而,当将外科医生作为协变量考虑时,ED和MD之间的总成本(P = .478)和供应成本(P = .468)差异可忽略不计。
ED在治疗腰椎间盘突出症方面已被证明是一种更具价值的选择,主要是因为围手术期护理方面的优势。在此,我们表明,在纠正外科医生层面的影响后,两种手术之间的成本在统计学上无显著差异,再次证实了ED所提供的价值。