术后结局在联邦指定医院星级评定中的差异。

Variation in Postoperative Outcomes Across Federally Designated Hospital Star Ratings.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Aug 1;159(8):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1582.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Despite widespread use to guide patients to hospitals providing the best care, it remains unknown whether Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital star ratings are a reliable measure of hospital surgical quality.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the CMS hospital star ratings and hospital surgical quality measured by 30-day postoperative mortality, serious complications, and readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and incisional hernia repair.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study evaluated 100% Medicare administrative claims for nonfederal acute care hospitals with a CMS hospital star rating for calendar years 2014-2018. Data analysis was performed from January 15, 2022, to April 30, 2023. Participants included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years who underwent colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair with continuous Medicare coverage for 3 months before and 6 months after surgery.

EXPOSURE

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services hospital star rating.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risk- and reliability-adjusted hospital rates of 30-day postoperative mortality, serious complications, and 30-day readmissions were measured and compared across hospitals and star ratings.

RESULTS

A total of 1 898 829 patients underwent colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair at 3240 hospitals with a CMS hospital star rating. Mean (SD) age was 74.8 (7.0) years, 50.6% of the patients were male, and 86.5% identified as White. Risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality rate decreased in a stepwise fashion from 6.80% (95% CI, 6.79%-6.81%) in 1-star hospitals to 4.93% (95% CI, 4.93%-4.94%) in 5-star hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.73-2.00). There was wide variation in the rates of hospital mortality (variation, 1.89%; range, 2.4%-16.2%), serious complications (variation, 1.97%; range, 5.5%-45.1%), and readmission (variation, 1.27%; range, 9.1%-22.5%) across all hospitals. After stratifying hospitals by their star rating, similar patterns of variation were observed within star rating groups for 30-day mortality: 1 star (variation, 1.91%; range, 3.6%-12.0%), 2 star (variation, 1.86%; range, 2.8%-16.2%), 3 star (variation, 1.84%; range, 2.9%-12.3%), 4 star (variation, 1.76%; range, 2.9%-11.5%), and 5 star (variation, 1.79%; range, 2.4%-9.1%). Similar patterns were observed for serious complications and readmissions.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Although CMS hospital star rating was associated with postoperative mortality, serious complications, and readmissions, there was wide variation in surgical outcomes within each star rating group. These findings highlight the limitations of the CMS hospital star rating system as a measure of surgical quality and should be a call for continued improvement of publicly reported hospital grade measures.

摘要

重要性

尽管广泛用于指导患者选择提供最佳护理的医院,但医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 (CMS) 的医院星级评分是否是衡量医院手术质量的可靠指标仍不清楚。

目的

检查 CMS 医院星级评分和通过 30 天术后死亡率、严重并发症和 Medicare 受益人的再入院率衡量的医院手术质量,这些患者接受了结肠切除术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术和切口疝修补术。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究评估了 2014-2018 年有 CMS 医院星级评分的非联邦急性护理医院的 100% 医疗保险行政索赔数据。数据分析于 2022 年 1 月 15 日至 2023 年 4 月 30 日进行。参与者包括年龄在 66 至 99 岁之间的按服务收费的 Medicare 受益人,他们在手术前连续 3 个月和手术后 6 个月内有 Medicare 连续覆盖,接受了结肠切除术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术或切口疝修补术。

暴露因素

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院星级评分。

主要结果和测量指标

在医院和星级评分之间测量和比较了 30 天术后死亡率、严重并发症和 30 天再入院的风险和可靠性调整后的医院发生率。

结果

共有 1898829 名患者在 3240 家有 CMS 医院星级评分的医院接受了结肠切除术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术或切口疝修补术。平均(SD)年龄为 74.8(7.0)岁,50.6%的患者为男性,86.5%为白人。风险和可靠性调整后的 30 天死亡率呈阶梯式下降,从 1 星级医院的 6.80%(95%CI,6.79%-6.81%)降至 5 星级医院的 4.93%(95%CI,4.93%-4.94%)(调整后的优势比,1.86;95%CI,1.73-2.00)。所有医院的医院死亡率(变化幅度,1.89%;范围,2.4%-16.2%)、严重并发症(变化幅度,1.97%;范围,5.5%-45.1%)和再入院(变化幅度,1.27%;范围,9.1%-22.5%)的发生率差异很大。在按星级评分对医院进行分层后,在每个星级评分组内,30 天死亡率的变化模式相似:1 星级(变化幅度,1.91%;范围,3.6%-12.0%)、2 星级(变化幅度,1.86%;范围,2.8%-16.2%)、3 星级(变化幅度,1.84%;范围,2.9%-12.3%)、4 星级(变化幅度,1.76%;范围,2.9%-11.5%)和 5 星级(变化幅度,1.79%;范围,2.4%-9.1%)。严重并发症和再入院也观察到类似的变化模式。

结论和相关性

尽管 CMS 医院星级评分与术后死亡率、严重并发症和再入院有关,但每个星级评分组内的手术结果差异很大。这些发现强调了 CMS 医院星级评分系统作为手术质量衡量标准的局限性,应该继续改进公开报告的医院等级衡量标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索