Pastorello Edoardo, Nicosia Luca, Triggiani Luca, Frassine Francesco, Vitali Paola, Salah El Din Tantawy Emiliano, Santoro Valeria, Rigo Michele, Gaito Simona, Mazzarotto Renzo, Buglione di Monale E Bastia Michela, Alongi Filippo
Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, 37024 Negrar, Italy.
University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 3;13(11):3291. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113291.
: Lymph-nodal prostate cancer oligometastases are differently treated according to their site: pelvic are locoregional lymph nodes; instead, para-aortic lymph nodes are considered as distant metastases. The aim of the study was a comparison between para-aortic and pelvic oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). : This is a retrospective analysis. De novo metastatic or extra-nodal disease were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed; the pattern of recurrence was also evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable cohorts. The primary end-point was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), ADT-free survival (ADTFS), polymetastases-free survival (PMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and pattern of relapse. : In total, 240 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 164 patients (127 pelvic and 37 para-aortic) were treated. The median PFS was 20 and 11 months in pelvic and para-aortic patients, respectively ( = 0.042). The difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis ( = 0.06). The median BRFS was 16 and 9 months, respectively, in the pelvic and para-aortic group ( = 0.07). No statistically significant differences for ADTFS or PMFS were detected. The cumulative 5-year LPFS was 90.5%. In PSM, no statistically significant differences for all the study end-points were detected. : Patients affected by para-aortic disease might have a PFS comparable to pelvic disease; local control is high in both cohorts. Our results also support the use of SBRT for para-aortic metastases.
盆腔的是区域淋巴结;相反,腹主动脉旁淋巴结被视为远处转移。本研究的目的是比较接受立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的腹主动脉旁和盆腔寡转移灶。
这是一项回顾性分析。排除初发转移或结外疾病。进行单因素和多因素分析;还评估了复发模式。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)创建可比队列。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点是无生化复发生存期(BRFS)、无雄激素剥夺治疗生存期(ADTFS)、无多发转移生存期(PMFS)、无局部进展生存期(LPFS)和复发模式。
总共治疗了164例患者的240个淋巴结寡转移灶(127个盆腔和37个腹主动脉旁)。盆腔和腹主动脉旁患者的中位PFS分别为20个月和11个月(P = 0.042)。多因素分析未证实该差异(P = 0.06)。盆腔和腹主动脉旁组的中位BRFS分别为16个月和9个月(P = 0.07)。未检测到ADTFS或PMFS有统计学显著差异。累积5年LPFS为90.5%。在PSM中,所有研究终点均未检测到统计学显著差异。
腹主动脉旁疾病患者的PFS可能与盆腔疾病相当;两组的局部控制率都很高。我们的结果也支持对腹主动脉旁转移灶使用SBRT。