• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估纤维肌痛女性的时间躯体感觉辨别能力:新评估工具的可靠性和区分能力。

Assessment of Temporal Somatosensory Discrimination in Females with Fibromyalgia: Reliability and Discriminative Ability of a New Assessment Tool.

机构信息

Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Centre, 4000 Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 22;24(11):3300. doi: 10.3390/s24113300.

DOI:10.3390/s24113300
PMID:38894094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11174602/
Abstract

We assessed the test-retest reliability and discriminative ability of a somatosensory temporal discrimination (SSTD) assessment tool for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and determined if pain-related variables were associated with SSTD performance. Twenty-five women with FMS and twenty-five asymptomatic women were assessed during two sessions 7 to 10 days apart. The proportion of correct responses (range 0-100) was calculated. Sociodemographic information was collected for both groups. The participants with FMS also completed the widespread pain index and the Brief Pain Inventory. Test-retest reliability was verified by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. Discriminative ability was verified by a between-group comparison of scores using a -test. Associations between SSTD score and pain variables were tested using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. The test-retest reliability of the SSTD score was excellent (ICC > 0.9, CI: 0.79-0.96) for the asymptomatic group and good for the FMS group (ICC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91). The median (Q1-Q3) test session SSTD score differed significantly between the FMS 84.1 (71-88) and the asymptomatic 91.6 (83.4-96.1) groups ( < 0.001). Only pain duration was associated with the SSTD score. In conclusion, the new SSTD test seems reliable for people with FMS and is discriminative. Further studies should examine its sensitivity to change and correlations with other SSTD tests.

摘要

我们评估了一种用于纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的体感时间辨别(SSTD)评估工具的重测信度和区分能力,并确定与 SSTD 表现相关的疼痛相关变量。25 名 FMS 女性和 25 名无症状女性在相隔 7 至 10 天的两次检查中接受评估。计算正确反应的比例(范围 0-100)。收集了两组的社会人口统计学信息。FMS 患者还完成了广泛性疼痛指数和简明疼痛量表。通过计算组内相关系数来验证重测信度。通过 t 检验对两组之间的分数进行比较来验证区分能力。使用 Pearson 或 Spearman 相关系数测试 SSTD 分数与疼痛变量之间的相关性。SSTD 分数的重测信度对于无症状组非常好(ICC>0.9,CI:0.79-0.96),对于 FMS 组则为良好(ICC:0.81,95%CI:0.62-0.91)。FMS 组的中位数(Q1-Q3)测试会话 SSTD 评分 84.1(71-88)与无症状组的 91.6(83.4-96.1)组有显著差异(<0.001)。只有疼痛持续时间与 SSTD 评分相关。总之,新的 SSTD 测试似乎对 FMS 患者可靠且具有区分能力。进一步的研究应该检查其对变化的敏感性以及与其他 SSTD 测试的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc24/11174602/67b9b18d0525/sensors-24-03300-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc24/11174602/d780546c7896/sensors-24-03300-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc24/11174602/67b9b18d0525/sensors-24-03300-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc24/11174602/d780546c7896/sensors-24-03300-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc24/11174602/67b9b18d0525/sensors-24-03300-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Temporal Somatosensory Discrimination in Females with Fibromyalgia: Reliability and Discriminative Ability of a New Assessment Tool.评估纤维肌痛女性的时间躯体感觉辨别能力:新评估工具的可靠性和区分能力。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 22;24(11):3300. doi: 10.3390/s24113300.
2
The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of fibromyalgia survey diagnostic criteria and symptom severity scale.纤维肌痛症调查诊断标准及症状严重程度量表土耳其语版本的信度和效度
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Apr 27;29(2):287-293. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150627.
3
Functioning in the fibromyalgia syndrome: validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0.纤维肌痛综合征中的功能障碍:WHODAS 2.0 的有效性和可靠性。
Adv Rheumatol. 2021 Sep 16;61(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s42358-021-00216-1.
4
Evaluation of a wearable body monitoring device during treadmill walking and jogging in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.评估可穿戴身体监测设备在纤维肌痛综合征患者进行跑步机行走和慢跑时的表现。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.021.
5
Tests of functional limitations in fibromyalgia syndrome: a reliability study.
Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Jun;12(3):193-9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:3<193::aid-art6>3.0.co;2-n.
6
Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Dutch Modified Perceived Deficits Questionnaire to Examine Cognitive Symptoms in Women with Chronic Whiplash, Chronic Idiopathic Neck Pain, and Fibromyalgia.荷兰改良感知缺陷问卷用于检查慢性挥鞭伤女性、慢性特发性颈部疼痛女性和纤维肌痛女性认知症状的效度和重测信度。
Pain Pract. 2018 Sep;18(7):850-863. doi: 10.1111/papr.12683. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
A Distorted Body Schema and Susceptibility to Experiencing Anomalous Somatosensory Sensations in Fibromyalgia Syndrome.纤维肌痛综合征中扭曲的身体图式和易感性与异常体感感觉有关。
Clin J Pain. 2019 Nov;35(11):887-893. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000754.
8
Feasibility of fitness tests in subjects with chronic pain (fibromyalgia): discordance between cycling and 2-km walking tests.
Rheumatol Int. 2001 Sep;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s002960100118.
9
Slowly Repeated Evoked Pain as a Marker of Central Sensitization in Fibromyalgia: Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability in Comparison With Temporal Summation of Pain.缓慢重复诱发疼痛作为纤维肌痛中中枢敏化的标志物:与疼痛时间总和相比的诊断准确性和可靠性。
Psychosom Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;80(6):573-580. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000599.
10
Relationship between the body image and level of pain, functional status, severity of depression, and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.纤维肌痛综合征患者的体像与疼痛程度、功能状态、抑郁严重程度和生活质量的关系。
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Jun;31(6):983-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1965-9. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of an 8-Week Home-Based Sensory Perception Training Game for People with Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Study.一项针对纤维肌痛患者的为期8周的居家感觉训练游戏的可行性研究:一项试点研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 29;25(1):134. doi: 10.3390/s25010134.

本文引用的文献

1
The diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome.纤维肌痛综合征的诊断。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Nov;22(6):570-574. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0402.
2
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Home-Based Sensory Perception Training Game for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Study.基于家庭的感觉知觉训练游戏对纤维肌痛患者的可行性和可接受性:一项初步研究。
Games Health J. 2023 Aug;12(4):288-294. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2022.0079. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3
Short-term improvements in the body schema can modulate pain perception in fibromyalgia syndrome.躯体构图的短期改善可以调节纤维肌痛综合征的疼痛感知。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1127-1135. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/2vn0uh. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
4
Altered synaptic connections and inhibitory network of the primary somatosensory cortex in chronic pain.慢性疼痛中初级体感皮层的突触连接和抑制性网络改变
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 1;26(2):69-75. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2022.26.2.69.
5
Neural Basis of Somatosensory Spatial and Temporal Discrimination in Humans: The Role of Sensory Detection.人类体感空间和时间辨别能力的神经基础:感觉检测的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Mar 30;32(7):1480-1493. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab301.
6
Fibromyalgia: Pathogenesis, Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Options Update.纤维肌痛:发病机制、作用机制、诊断和治疗选择更新。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 9;22(8):3891. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083891.
7
Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination in Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的体感时间辨别。
Autism Res. 2021 Apr;14(4):656-667. doi: 10.1002/aur.2479. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Somatosensory temporal discrimination is impaired in fibromyalgia.纤维肌痛患者的体感时间辨别能力受损。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Feb;60:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.067. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria.2016年对2010/2011年纤维肌痛诊断标准的修订。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):319-329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
Somatosensory temporal discrimination remains intact in tension-type headache whereas it is disrupted in migraine attacks.躯体感觉时间辨别在紧张型头痛中保持完整,而在偏头痛发作中则被破坏。
Cephalalgia. 2017 Nov;37(13):1241-1247. doi: 10.1177/0333102416677050. Epub 2016 Nov 4.