UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
UGA Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
J Sport Rehabil. 2024 Jun 19;33(5):356-364. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2023-0292. Print 2024 Jul 1.
Dual-task (simultaneous cognitive-motor activities) assessments have been adapted into reliable and valid clinical concussion measures. However, abundant motor and cognitive variations leave researchers and clinicians uncertain about which combinations elicit the intended dual-task effect. Our objective was to examine differences between commonly employed dual-task motor and cognitive combinations among healthy, college-aged individuals.
Cross-sectional laboratory study.
Twenty participants (age: 21.3 [2.4] y; height: 176.0 [9.1] cm; mass: 76.0 [16.4] kg; 20% with concussion history) completed 4 motor tasks (gait, tandem gait, single-leg balance, and tandem balance) under 5 cognitive conditions (single task, subtraction, month reversal, spelling backward, and visual Stroop) in a research laboratory. The motor performance outcomes were spatiotemporal variables for gait and tandem gait and center of pressure path length (in centimeters) for single-leg and tandem balance. Cognitive outcomes were response rate (responses/second) and cognitive accuracy. We used separate repeated-measures analyses of variance for each motor and cognitive outcome with post hoc Tukey t tests.
Gait velocity, gait stride length, and tandem gait velocity demonstrated significant cognitive-motor interactions (P's < .001) such that all dual-task conditions resulted in varyingly slower or shorter movement than single task. Conversely, single-leg balance (P = .627) and tandem balance (P = .434) center of pressure path length did not significantly differ among the dual-task cognitive conditions or relative to single task. Statistically significant cognitive-motor interactions were observed only for spelling backward accuracy (P = .004) and response rates for spelling backward, month reversal, and visual Stroop (P's < .001) such that worse accuracy, but faster response rates, occurred during motor tasks.
Gait and tandem gait motor tasks accompanied with spelling backward or subtraction cognitive tasks demonstrated consistently strong dual-task effects and, therefore, may be the best suited for clinical and research use following concussion.
双重任务(同时进行认知和运动活动)评估已被改编为可靠且有效的临床脑震荡测量方法。然而,大量的运动和认知变化使得研究人员和临床医生不确定哪些组合会产生预期的双重任务效果。我们的目的是检查健康大学生中常用的双重任务运动和认知组合之间的差异。
横断面实验室研究。
20 名参与者(年龄:21.3 [2.4] 岁;身高:176.0 [9.1] 厘米;体重:76.0 [16.4] 千克;20%有脑震荡史)在研究实验室中完成了 4 项运动任务(步态、并足步态、单腿平衡和并足平衡)和 5 项认知任务(单任务、减法、月份反转、拼写倒序和视觉斯特鲁普)。运动表现结果是步态和并足步态的时空变量,单腿和并足平衡的重心路径长度(以厘米为单位)。认知结果是反应率(每秒反应次数)和认知准确性。我们对每个运动和认知结果使用单独的重复测量方差分析,并进行事后 Tukey t 检验。
步态速度、步态步长和并足步态速度表现出显著的认知-运动相互作用(P 值<.001),所有双重任务条件的运动速度都比单任务条件慢或短。相反,单腿平衡(P=.627)和并足平衡(P=.434)的重心路径长度在双重任务认知条件之间或与单任务相比没有显著差异。仅在拼写倒序准确性(P=.004)和拼写倒序、月份反转和视觉斯特鲁普的反应率(P 值<.001)上观察到显著的认知-运动相互作用,即运动任务时准确性较差,但反应速度较快。
步态和并足步态运动任务与拼写倒序或减法认知任务相结合,表现出一致的强双重任务效应,因此,在脑震荡后可能最适合临床和研究使用。