Moreu Manuel, Gómez-Escalonilla Carlos, Miralbes Salvador, Naravetla Bharath, Spiotta Alejandro M, Loehr Christian, Martínez-Galdámez Mario, McTaggart Ryan A, Defreyne Luc, Vega Pedro, Zaidat Osama O, Price Lori Lyn, Liebeskind David S, Möhlenbruch Markus A, Gupta Rishi, Rosati Santiago
Radiology department, Neurointerventional unit, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 1;17(e2):e326-e332. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021650.
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is part of the standard of care for stroke treatment, and improving its efficacy is one of the main objectives of clinical investigation. Of importance is placement of the distal end of balloon-guided catheters (BGC). We aim to determine if this influences outcomes.
We analyzed data from the ASSIST Registry, an international, multicenter prospective study of 1492 patients. We divided patients treated with BGC according to the placement of the BGC: low cervical (LCG (the lower 2/3 of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA)) or high cervical (HCG (upper 1/3 of cervical ICA, petro-lacerum or higher)). We analyzed characteristics and outcomes overall and stratified on the primary MT technique: Stent-Retriever only (SR Classic), Combined use of aspiration catheter and SR (Combined), and Direct Aspiration (ADAPT).
Our study included 704 subjects -323 in the low cervical and 381 in the high cervical groups. Statistical differences were seen in the proportion of females and tandem lesions (both higher for LCG). Placing the BGC in the high cervical segment is associated with better recanalization rates (expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score of 2c-3) at the end of the procedure (P<0.0001) and shorter procedures (P=0.0005). After stratifying on the three primary techniques (SR Classic, Combined, and ADAPT), placing the BGC in the high segment is associated with a better first-pass effect (FPE), less distal emboli, and better clinical outcomes in the SR Classic technique.
Placing the distal end of the BGC at the high cervical segment or higher is associated with better recanalization.
机械取栓术(MT)是卒中治疗标准护理的一部分,提高其疗效是临床研究的主要目标之一。球囊引导导管(BGC)远端的放置很重要。我们旨在确定这是否会影响治疗结果。
我们分析了来自ASSIST注册研究的数据,这是一项对1492例患者进行的国际多中心前瞻性研究。我们根据BGC的放置位置将接受BGC治疗的患者分为:低颈段(LCG,颈内动脉(ICA)颈段的下2/3)或高颈段(HCG,ICA颈段的上1/3、岩骨段或更高位置)。我们分析了总体特征和结果,并根据主要的MT技术进行分层:仅使用支架取栓器(SR Classic)、抽吸导管与SR联合使用(联合使用)以及直接抽吸(ADAPT)。
我们的研究纳入了704名受试者,低颈段组323例,高颈段组381例。在女性比例和串联病变方面存在统计学差异(LCG组两者比例更高)。将BGC放置在高颈段与术后更好的再通率(脑梗死扩展治疗(eTICI)评分2c - 3)相关(P<0.0001),且手术时间更短(P = 0.0005)。在对三种主要技术(SR Classic、联合使用和ADAPT)进行分层后,在SR Classic技术中,将BGC放置在高段与更好的首次通过效应(FPE)、更少的远端栓子以及更好的临床结果相关。
将BGC远端放置在高颈段或更高位置与更好的再通相关。