Department of Pathology, Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India.
Department of Paediatrics, Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India.
Natl Med J India. 2023 Nov-Dec;36(6):379-383. doi: 10.25259/NMJI_461_2022.
Background The competency-based undergraduate medical curriculum has a number of new elements. Few authors have attempted to understand the students' viewpoints on the curriculum. We assessed undergraduate students perspectives and ratings about various elements after 2 years of implementation of the curriculum. Methods We included 240 students (2019 and 2020 admission). An invitation letter-cum-information sheet was sent to all the students by email informing them about the study, keeping their identity confidential and the implied consent. A validated questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale including 35 closed-ended questions eliciting the students' perception on various elements of the new curriculum and a rating scale from 1 to 5 was designed. Data collection was done using Google forms. Results Of the 240 respondents, 192 (80%) had positive perceptions for the Foundation Course, Attitude, Ethics and Communication skills, Early Clinical Exposure and Community Health Visits. Integrated Teaching, Small Group Teaching and Assessments were viewed less positively (62.9%-75%) and Self-directed Learning received the lowest positive responses (57%-58%). For training as a doctor, the elements considered most valuable were Early Clinical Exposure (70.4%) and Community Health Visits (70.4%) while the least were Logbooks (35.5%) and Reflections (34.2%). Conclusions Students found Early Clinical Exposure and Community Health Visits the most valuable elements whereas Self-directed Learning, Logbooks and Reflections were rated as the least useful.
背景 以能力为基础的本科医学课程有许多新元素。很少有作者试图了解学生对课程的看法。在课程实施两年后,我们评估了本科生对各种元素的观点和评价。
方法 我们纳入了 240 名学生(2019 年和 2020 年入学)。我们通过电子邮件向所有学生发送了一封邀请信和信息表,告知他们这项研究,同时保证他们的身份保密和默示同意。我们设计了一个基于 5 点李克特量表的有效问卷,包括 35 个封闭式问题,以了解学生对新课程各个元素的看法,以及从 1 到 5 的评分量表。数据收集是使用谷歌表格完成的。
结果 在 240 名受访者中,192 名(80%)对基础课程、态度、伦理和沟通技巧、早期临床体验和社区卫生访问持积极看法。综合教学、小组教学和评估的看法不太积极(62.9%-75%),而自我指导学习的积极反应最低(57%-58%)。对于成为医生的培训,受访者认为最有价值的元素是早期临床体验(70.4%)和社区卫生访问(70.4%),而最不重要的是日志(35.5%)和反思(34.2%)。
结论 学生认为早期临床体验和社区卫生访问是最有价值的元素,而自我指导学习、日志和反思则被认为是最没有用的。