Jasik Katarzyna, Śnieżek Lucjan, Kluczyński Janusz, Łuszczek Jakub, Grzelak Krzysztof, Sarzyński Bartłomiej, Szachogłuchowicz Ireneusz
Institute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jun 7;17(12):2801. doi: 10.3390/ma17122801.
The material extrusion (MEX) method utilizing highly filled metal filament presents an alternative to advanced additive metal manufacturing technologies. This process enables the production of metal objects through deposition and sintering, which is particularly attractive compared to powder bed fusion (PBF) technologies employing lasers or high-power electron beams. PBF requires costly maintenance, skilled operators, and controlled process conditions, whereas MEX does not impose such requirements. This study compares research on 17-4 PH steel manufactured using two different commercially available techniques: MEX and powder bed fusion with laser beam melting (PBF-LB/M). This research included assessing the density of printed samples, analyzing surface roughness in two printing planes, examining microstructure including porosity and density determination, and measuring hardness. The conducted research aimed to determine the durability and quality of the obtained samples and to evaluate their strength. The research results indicated that samples produced using the PBF-LB/M technology exhibited better density and a more homogeneous structure. However, MEX samples exhibited better strength properties (hardness).
利用高填充金属丝材的材料挤出(MEX)方法为先进的增材金属制造技术提供了一种替代方案。该工艺通过沉积和烧结实现金属物体的生产,与采用激光或高功率电子束的粉末床熔融(PBF)技术相比,具有特别的吸引力。PBF需要昂贵的维护、熟练的操作人员和可控的工艺条件,而MEX则没有这些要求。本研究比较了使用两种不同商业可用技术制造的17-4 PH钢的研究:MEX和激光束熔融粉末床熔融(PBF-LB/M)。这项研究包括评估打印样品的密度、分析两个打印平面的表面粗糙度、检查微观结构(包括孔隙率和密度测定)以及测量硬度。所进行的研究旨在确定所得样品的耐久性和质量,并评估其强度。研究结果表明,使用PBF-LB/M技术生产的样品表现出更好的密度和更均匀的结构。然而,MEX样品表现出更好的强度性能(硬度)。