Australia Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Australia Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Ketim Therapeutics, Brisbane, Australia.
Cytotherapy. 2024 Nov;26(11):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 31.
With the continuous development and advancement of human pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived cell therapies, an ever-increasing number of clinical indications can benefit from their application. Due to the capacity for PSCs to form teratomas, safety testing is required to ensure the absence of residual PSCs in a cell product. To mitigate these limitations, in vitro analytical methods can be utilized as quality control after the production of a PSC-derived cell product. Sensitivity of these analytic methods is critical in accurately quantifying residual PSC in the final cell product. In this study, we compared the sensitivity of three in vitro assays: qPCR, ddPCR and RT-LAMP.
The spike-in samples were produced from three independent experiments, each spiked with different PSC lines (PSC1, NH50191, and WA09 referred to as H9) into a background of primary fibroblasts (Hs68). These samples were then subjected to qPCR, ddPCR and RT-LAMP to determine their detection limit in measuring a commonly used PSC marker, LIN28A.
The results indicated that the three analytic methods all exhibited consistent results across different cell-line spiked samples, with ddPCR demonstrating the highest sensitivity of the three methods. The LIN28A ddPCR assay could confidently detect 10 residual PSCs in a million fibroblasts.
In our hand, ddPCR LIN28A assay demonstrated the highest sensitivity for detection of residual PSCs compared to the other two assays. Correlating such in vitro safety results with corresponding in vivo studies demonstrating the tumorigenicity profile of PSC-derived cell therapy could accelerate the safe clinical translation of cell therapy.
随着人类多能干细胞(PSC)衍生细胞疗法的不断发展和进步,越来越多的临床适应证可以从中受益。由于 PSC 具有形成畸胎瘤的能力,因此需要进行安全性测试以确保细胞产品中不存在残留的 PSC。为了减轻这些限制,可以在 PSC 衍生细胞产品生产后使用体外分析方法作为质量控制。这些分析方法的灵敏度对于准确量化最终细胞产品中的残留 PSC 至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了三种体外检测方法的灵敏度:qPCR、ddPCR 和 RT-LAMP。
将 Spike-in 样本从三个独立的实验中产生,每个实验均将不同的 PSC 系(PSC1、NH50191 和 WA09,称为 H9)掺入到原代成纤维细胞(Hs68)背景中。然后将这些样品进行 qPCR、ddPCR 和 RT-LAMP 检测,以确定它们在测量常用 PSC 标志物 LIN28A 时的检测限。
结果表明,三种分析方法在不同的细胞系掺入样本中均表现出一致的结果,ddPCR 是三种方法中灵敏度最高的。LIN28A ddPCR 检测可以在 100 万个成纤维细胞中自信地检测到 10 个残留的 PSC。
在我们手中,ddPCR LIN28A 检测法与其他两种检测法相比,检测残留 PSC 的灵敏度最高。将这种体外安全性结果与证明 PSC 衍生细胞疗法致瘤性特征的相应体内研究相关联,可以加速细胞疗法的安全临床转化。