Centro Regional de Investigación Remehue, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Ruta 5 km 8 norte, 5290000 Osorno, Región de Los Lagos, Chile.
Centro Regional de Investigación Remehue, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Ruta 5 km 8 norte, 5290000 Osorno, Región de Los Lagos, Chile.
Animal. 2024 Jul;18(7):101203. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101203. Epub 2024 May 24.
No single enteric CH mitigating strategy has been consistently effective or is readily applicable to ruminants in grassland systems. When CH mitigating strategies are effective under grazing conditions, mitigation is mild to moderate at best. A study was conducted to evaluate the potential of combining two CH mitigation strategies deemed feasible to apply in grazing dairy cows, the methanogenesis inhibitor 3-nitrooxypropanol additive (3-NOP) and cottonseed supplementation (CTS), seeking to enhance their individual CH mitigating potential. Forty-eight dairy cows were evaluated in a continuous grazing study and supplemented with either a starch-based concentrate (STA) or one that contained cottonseeds (1.75 kg DM/d; CTS), and with either 19 g/d of 10% 3-NOP (Bovaer®) or the additive's carrier (placebo), in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Treatments were supplied mixed with a concentrate supplement (5 kg/d as fed) and offered in two equal rations at milking. Methane emissions were measured on weeks 4 and 8 using the sulphur hexafluoride tracer gas technique over a 5-d period. The 3-NOP and CTS treatments tended to interact on absolute CH such that 3-NOP decreased CH by 13.4% with STA, but there was no mitigation with 3-NOP and CTS. Treatment interactions were also obtained for CH yield, where 3-NOP tended to decrease CH when supplied with STA, and tended to increase it with CTS. The increase in CH yield with the CTS diet was driven by a numerical decrease in DM intake. Methane intensity was not affected by the 3-NOP or CTS treatments. Total volatile fatty acids in ruminal fluid were not affected by 3-NOP supplementation, but a reduction in acetate and an increase in propionate proportion occurred, resulting in decreased acetate: propionate. The 3-NOP additive decreased grass intake; however, energy-corrected milk yield and milk composition were largely unaffected. Milk urea increased with 3-NOP supplementation. Combining twice daily supplementation of 3-NOP and CTS did not enhance their CH mitigation potential when fed to grazing dairy cows. The relatively low inhibition of CH production by 3-NOP compared to studies with total mixed rations may result from the mode of delivery (pulse dosed twice daily) and time gap caused by experimental handling and moving of animals to pasture after 3-NOP supplementation in the milking parlour, which could have impaired the synchrony between the additive presence in the rumen and grass intake in paddocks.
没有单一的肠道 CH 缓解策略始终有效,或者在草原系统中的反刍动物中易于应用。当放牧条件下的 CH 缓解策略有效时,缓解效果充其量只是温和的。进行了一项研究来评估将两种被认为可行的 CH 缓解策略结合起来的潜力,这些策略适用于放牧奶牛,即甲烷生成抑制剂 3-硝基氧基丙醇添加剂(3-NOP)和棉籽补充剂(CTS),旨在增强它们各自的 CH 缓解潜力。在一项连续放牧研究中,评估了 48 头奶牛,这些奶牛分别用基于淀粉的浓缩物(STA)或含有棉籽的浓缩物(1.75 kg DM/d;CTS)进行补充,并每天补充 19 g 的 10% 3-NOP(Bovaer®)或添加剂的载体(安慰剂),以 2×2 因子处理安排进行补充。处理物与浓缩物补充剂(5 kg/d 干物质)混合,并在两次挤奶时提供等量的两种处理。使用六氟化硫示踪气体技术在 5 天的时间内测量第 4 周和第 8 周的甲烷排放量。3-NOP 和 CTS 处理在绝对 CH 方面有相互作用的趋势,即 3-NOP 使 STA 中的 CH 减少了 13.4%,但与 3-NOP 和 CTS 没有缓解。CH 产量也存在处理相互作用,其中 3-NOP 与 STA 一起供应时趋于降低 CH,而与 CTS 一起供应时趋于增加 CH。由于 DM 摄入量的数值减少,CTS 饮食导致 CH 产量增加。甲烷强度不受 3-NOP 或 CTS 处理的影响。瘤胃液中的总挥发性脂肪酸不受 3-NOP 补充的影响,但乙酸比例减少,丙酸比例增加,导致乙酸:丙酸降低。3-NOP 添加剂减少了草的摄入量;然而,能量校正奶产量和牛奶成分基本不受影响。3-NOP 补充会增加牛奶尿素。当给放牧奶牛同时每天两次补充 3-NOP 和 CTS 时,并没有增强它们的 CH 缓解潜力。与全混合日粮研究相比,3-NOP 对 CH 生产的抑制作用相对较低,这可能是由于其传递方式(每天两次脉冲给药)以及在泌乳厅补充 3-NOP 后由于实验处理和动物转移到牧场而导致的时间间隔,这可能会破坏添加剂在瘤胃中的存在与草在围场中的摄入之间的同步性。