Schuh Alexander, Feyrer Matthias, Benditz Achim, Sesselmann Stefan, Koehl Philipp
Department of Musculoskeletal Research, Hospital of Trauma Surgery, Marktredwitz Hospital, Marktredwitz, Germany.
Department of Industrial Engineering and Health, Institute of Medical Engineering, Technical University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden, Weiden, Germany.
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(5):3613-3619. doi: 10.3233/THC-240016.
Uncemented acetabular components are widely used in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modularity has numerous advantages including the ability to use supplementary screw fixation for the shell, and allow to switch from ceramic to polyethylene (PE) bearings and vice versa, and the use of lipped and face-changing liners.
Despite these advantages, a problem with modular PE liners is dissociation. This is a rare complication in modern implants. The rate of liner dissociation is reported to be very low between 0.17% and 0.8%. Typical symptoms are sudden onset of groin pain in a previously well-functioning hip joint, followed by grinding or clicking sensations during hip joint motions indicating, that the femoral head is articulating with the metal acetabular shell rather than with the PE liner. Any newly observed noise or squeaking from a THA should undergo radiographic investigation to exclude liner dissociation.
We present the case of an 88-yearold male patient who developed PE liner dissociation in a cementless THA with a Pinnacle acetabular component six years after the index operation. We recommended revision of the left hip, which was performed two days later. In the interim, the patient was advised to use a pair of crutches. During revision surgery, it was observed that the metal head made contact with the cementless cup shell without damaging it from a macroscopic standpoint. Consequently, a simple exchange of the PE liner was conducted, and a 36 mm metal head was implanted due to scratches on the original head.
Early diagnosis facilitates a straightforward exchange of the liner along with the head, potentially preserving the osseous integrated cup shell and stem integrity. Routine radiologic follow-up allows to distinguish between PE liner dissociation and severe PE wear.
非骨水泥型髋臼假体在现代全髋关节置换术(THA)中广泛应用。模块化具有诸多优点,包括能够对髋臼杯使用辅助螺钉固定,可在陶瓷与聚乙烯(PE)衬垫之间切换,以及使用带唇缘和可更换表面的衬垫。
尽管有这些优点,但模块化PE衬垫存在分离问题。这在现代植入物中是一种罕见的并发症。据报道,衬垫分离率非常低,在0.17%至0.8%之间。典型症状是先前功能良好的髋关节突然出现腹股沟疼痛,随后在髋关节活动时出现摩擦或咔嗒声,这表明股骨头与金属髋臼杯而非PE衬垫相接触。任何新观察到的来自THA的噪音或吱吱声都应进行影像学检查以排除衬垫分离。
我们报告一例88岁男性患者,在初次手术后六年,其使用Pinnacle髋臼组件的非骨水泥型THA中发生了PE衬垫分离。我们建议对左髋关节进行翻修,两天后进行了手术。在此期间,建议患者使用双拐。在翻修手术中,观察到金属股骨头与非骨水泥杯壳接触,从宏观角度看未对其造成损坏。因此,进行了PE衬垫的简单更换,并因原股骨头有划痕而植入了一个36毫米的金属股骨头。
早期诊断有助于直接更换衬垫和股骨头,有可能保留骨整合的杯壳和柄的完整性。常规影像学随访有助于区分PE衬垫分离和严重的PE磨损。