Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Austin, Texas, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Epilepsia. 2024 Aug;65(8):2423-2437. doi: 10.1111/epi.18030. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
A surgical "treatment gap" in pediatric epilepsy persists despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of surgery. For this reason, the national surgical landscape should be investigated such that an updated assessment may more appropriately guide health care efforts.
In our retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for individuals 0 to <18 years of age who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This cohort was then split into a medical group and a surgical group. The former was defined by ICD codes for -DRE without an accompanying surgical code, and the latter was defined by DRE and one of the following epilepsy surgeries: any open surgery; laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); vagus nerve stimulation; or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) from 1998 to 2020. Demographic variables of age, gender, race, insurance type, hospital charge, and hospital characteristics were analyzed between surgical options. Continuous variables were analyzed with weight-adjusted quantile regression analysis, and categorical variables were analyzed by weight-adjusted counts with percentages and compared with weight-adjusted chi-square test results.
These data indicate an increase in epilepsy surgeries over a 22-year period, primarily due to a statistically significant increase in open surgery and a non-significant increase in minimally invasive techniques, such as LITT and RNS. There are significant differences in age, race, gender, insurance type, median household income, Elixhauser index, hospital setting, and size between the medical and surgical groups, as well as the procedure performed.
An increase in open surgery and minimally invasive surgeries (LITT and RNS) account for the overall rise in pediatric epilepsy surgery over the last 22 years. A positive inflection point in open surgery is seen in 2005. Socioeconomic disparities exist between medical and surgical groups. Patient and hospital sociodemographics show significant differences between the procedure performed. Further efforts are required to close the surgical "treatment gap."
尽管手术的安全性和有效性已得到证实,但小儿癫痫仍存在手术“治疗差距”。出于这个原因,应该调查全国的手术情况,以便对其进行更全面的评估,从而更恰当地指导医疗保健工作。
在我们回顾性的横断面观察性研究中,查询了国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,以获取 0 至 <18 岁患有药物难治性癫痫(DRE)国际疾病分类(ICD)代码的个体。然后,将该队列分为医疗组和手术组。前者的定义是 ICD 代码为-DRE 但无伴随手术代码,后者的定义是 DRE 和以下癫痫手术之一:任何开放性手术;激光间质热疗(LITT);迷走神经刺激术;或响应性神经刺激术(RNS),时间为 1998 年至 2020 年。分析了手术选择之间的年龄、性别、种族、保险类型、医院费用和医院特征等人口统计学变量。对连续变量进行加权分位数回归分析,对分类变量进行加权计数分析,并与加权卡方检验结果进行比较。
这些数据表明,在过去的 22 年中,癫痫手术的数量有所增加,这主要是由于开放性手术的数量呈统计学显著增加,微创技术(如 LITT 和 RNS)的数量非显著增加所致。在医疗组和手术组之间,以及在手术方式上,存在年龄、种族、性别、保险类型、中位数家庭收入、Elixhauser 指数、医院环境和规模等方面的显著差异。
开放性手术和微创技术(LITT 和 RNS)的增加是过去 22 年来小儿癫痫手术总体增加的原因。开放性手术在 2005 年出现了正拐点。在医疗组和手术组之间存在社会经济差异。患者和医院的社会人口统计学特征在手术方式上存在显著差异。需要进一步努力缩小手术“治疗差距”。