SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Dept of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH), RCSI, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0305755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305755. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to measure student satisfaction with a revised ophthalmology delivery format, which due to the pandemic had previously relied on a remote online flipped classroom (OFC) format compared to a blended learning format. This educational strategy combined online learning with in-person seminars and practical patient centred sessions. Our previous investigations demonstrated a significant lack of student satisfaction with a curriculum solely reliant on a remote OFC, as such we hypothesised that a blended learning approach would result in improved levels of student satisfaction and knowledge gain.
Non-randomised intervention study of two groups; group 1 = OFC group and group 2 = BL group, compared perspectives of 4th year ophthalmology students using a validated course evaluation questionnaire (CEQ).
A total of 59 students from the BL group (n = 257; response rate = 23.0%) and 28 from the OFC group agreed to participate in the study (n = 114; response rate = 24.6%). Participants in the BL group felt it was easier to determine the standard of work that was expected (77.42% v 60.71%) and demonstrated significantly increased satisfaction with staff motivation of students (95.16% v 64.29%, p <0.001) and provision of feedback (74.19% v 46.43%, p = 0.004), compared to the OFC group. Furthermore, students in the BL group also felt the course significantly improved their analytical skills (64.52% v 42.85%, p = 0.023) and ability to work as part of team (69.36% v 25%, p <0.001) as well as reporting reduced dissatisfaction with the level of choice afforded in terms of how they would learn (33.88% v 60.71%, p = 0.31) and the how they were assessed (59.68% v 89.28%, p = 0.004). No evidence of a statistical difference in exam score was observed.
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an unavoidable pivot to online and distance learning, to meet the challenges presented by government mandates and social distancing requirements. Since many of these directives have been reversed, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness and learner perceptions' of the online and distance learning interventions. In this study we demonstrated a significant student preference for BL compared to the OFC approach, with comparable student performances determined by MCQ examinations. Our findings suggest a preference for reintroducing in-person and patient engagement activities in post-pandemic health professions education.
本研究旨在衡量学生对眼科教学模式修订的满意度,由于疫情,该模式之前依赖远程在线翻转课堂(OFC)模式,而不是混合学习模式。这种教育策略将在线学习与面对面研讨会和以患者为中心的实践课程相结合。我们之前的研究表明,学生对完全依赖远程 OFC 的课程满意度显著较低,因此我们假设混合学习方法将提高学生的满意度和知识获取水平。
对两组进行非随机干预研究;第 1 组 = OFC 组,第 2 组 = BL 组,使用经过验证的课程评估问卷(CEQ)比较第 4 年眼科学生的观点。
共有 59 名来自 BL 组(n = 257;应答率 = 23.0%)和 28 名来自 OFC 组的学生同意参与研究(n = 114;应答率 = 24.6%)。BL 组的参与者认为更容易确定预期的工作标准(77.42% v 60.71%),并且对学生的员工激励(95.16% v 64.29%,p <0.001)和提供反馈(74.19% v 46.43%,p = 0.004)的满意度显著提高,与 OFC 组相比。此外,BL 组的学生还认为该课程显著提高了他们的分析能力(64.52% v 42.85%,p = 0.023)和团队合作能力(69.36% v 25%,p <0.001),同时减少了对学习方式(33.88% v 60.71%,p = 0.31)和评估方式(59.68% v 89.28%,p = 0.004)的不满。未观察到考试成绩存在统计学差异的证据。
由于政府命令和社会距离要求带来的挑战,COVID-19 大流行迫使我们不得不转向在线和远程学习,以满足这些挑战。由于这些指令中的许多已被推翻,因此评估在线和远程学习干预措施的有效性和学习者的看法非常重要。在这项研究中,我们证明了与 OFC 方法相比,学生对 BL 有明显的偏好,通过多项选择题考试确定了相似的学生表现。我们的研究结果表明,在大流行后的健康专业教育中,我们更倾向于引入面对面和患者参与的活动。