Suppr超能文献

评估甲胎蛋白参考物质的互换性:通过多个系统进行准确赋值和真实性验证。

Evaluating the Commutability of Reference Materials for α-Fetoprotein: Accurate Value Assignment With Multiple Systems and Trueness Verification.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2024 Nov 1;44(6):507-517. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0447. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accurate measurement of α-fetoprotein (AFP) is critical for clinical diagnosis. However, different AFP immunoassays may yield different results. Appropriate AFP reference materials (RMs) were selected and assigned accurate values for applications with external quality assessment (EQA) programs to standardize AFP measurements.

METHODS

Forty individual clinical samples and six different concentrations of candidate RMs (Can-RMs, L1-L6) were prepared by the Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories. The Can-RMs were assigned target values by performing five immunoassays, using WHO International Standard 72/225 as a calibrator, and sent to 45 clinical laboratories in Beijing for AFP measurements. The commutability of all RMs was assessed based on CLSI and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) approaches. Analytical performance was assessed for compliance based on accuracy (total error, TE), trueness (bias), and precision (CV).

RESULTS

The Can-RMs were commutable for all immunoassays using the CLSI approach and for 6 of 10 assay combinations using the IFCC approach. RMs diluted in WHO RM 72/225 were commutable among all assays with the CLSI approach, except for serum matrix (Autolumo vs. Roche analyzer) and diluted water matrix (Abbott vs. Roche/Mindray analyzer), whereas some inconclusive and non-commutable results were found using the IFCC approach. The average pass rates based on the TE, bias, and CV were 91%, 81%, and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The commutability of the RMs differed between both evaluation approaches. The Can-RMs exhibited good commutability with the CLSI approach, suggesting their suitability for use with that approach as commutable EQA materials with assigned values and for monitoring the performance of AFP measurements.

摘要

背景

准确测量甲胎蛋白(AFP)对于临床诊断至关重要。然而,不同的 AFP 免疫分析方法可能会产生不同的结果。选择合适的 AFP 参考物质(RM)并为应用外部质量评估(EQA)计划赋值准确值,以标准化 AFP 测量。

方法

北京临床检验中心制备了 40 份个体临床样本和 6 种不同浓度的候选 RM(Can-RM,L1-L6)。使用世界卫生组织国际标准 72/225 作为校准品,通过 5 种免疫分析法对 Can-RM 赋值,并将其发送至北京的 45 家临床实验室进行 AFP 测量。根据 CLSI 和国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会(IFCC)方法评估所有 RM 的可互换性。根据准确度(总误差,TE)、真实性(偏差)和精密度(CV)评估分析性能是否符合要求。

结果

Can-RM 使用 CLSI 方法对于所有免疫分析法均具有可互换性,使用 IFCC 方法对于 10 种分析组合中的 6 种组合具有可互换性。使用 CLSI 方法,在 RM 中稀释的 RM 72/225 在所有分析中均具有可互换性,除血清基质(Autolumo 与罗氏分析仪)和稀释水基质(Abbott 与罗氏/Mindray 分析仪)外,而使用 IFCC 方法时则发现一些不确定和不可互换的结果。基于 TE、偏差和 CV 的平均通过率分别为 91%、81%和 95%。

结论

RM 的可互换性在两种评估方法之间存在差异。Can-RM 与 CLSI 方法具有良好的可互换性,表明它们适合与该方法一起使用,作为具有赋值的可互换 EQA 材料,用于监测 AFP 测量的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba2/11375202/ad4694106e9a/alm-44-6-507-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验