Harris John M
Independent Scholar, Tucson, AZ.
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Dec 1;239(6):609-614. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001140. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
William Halsted wrote to aging surgeon, Stephen Smith, in 1919, that he remembered the lessons Smith had taught him, "when I walked with you through the wards of Bellevue Hospital." Smith was an early advocate of Joseph Lister's antiseptic method, and because of his public health work, he was also an early advocate of environmental hygiene and microbial control based on the unproved germ theory. Although Lister's work at the time emphasized germ killing around the operative site with carbolic acid (antisepsis), Smith adopted and encouraged surgical practices at Bellevue that would be hallmarks of the germ-preventing (asepsis) surgical approach that fully developed after German bacteriologic discoveries in the mid-1880s, and with which Halsted is historically identified. Some physicians and historians have emphasized temporal and conceptual differences between Lister's antisepsis and German asepsis, but Smith and Halsted's experiences argue that surgical asepsis was the evolutionary outcome of germ theory-based surgical changes that began well before scientific proof arrived.
1919年,威廉·霍尔斯特德写信给年迈的外科医生斯蒂芬·史密斯,说他还记得史密斯教给他的那些经验教训,“那时我和您一起走过贝尔维尤医院的病房”。史密斯是约瑟夫·李斯特抗菌方法的早期倡导者,由于他在公共卫生方面的工作,他也是基于未经证实的细菌理论的环境卫生和微生物控制的早期倡导者。尽管当时李斯特的工作强调用石炭酸在手术部位周围杀灭细菌(防腐),但史密斯在贝尔维尤医院采用并鼓励了一些外科手术做法,这些做法将成为19世纪80年代中期德国细菌学发现后充分发展起来的预防细菌(无菌)手术方法的标志,而霍尔斯特德在历史上也与这种方法联系在一起。一些医生和历史学家强调了李斯特的防腐法与德国无菌法在时间和概念上的差异,但史密斯和霍尔斯特德的经历表明,手术无菌法是基于细菌理论的外科变革的进化结果,这些变革早在科学证据出现之前就开始了。