School of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
School of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
J Immunol Methods. 2024 Sep;532:113716. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2024.113716. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
The human monocytic THP-1 cell line is the most routinely employed in vitro model for studying monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. Despite the wide use of this model, differentiation protocols using phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D) vary drastically between studies. Given that differences in differentiation protocols have the potential to impact the characteristics of the macrophages produced, we aimed to assess the efficacy of three different THP-1 differentiation protocols by assessing changes in morphology and gene- and cell surface macrophage marker expression. THP-1 cells were differentiated with either 5 nM PMA, 10 nM 1,25D, or a combination thereof, followed by a rest period. The results indicated that all three protocols significantly increased the expression of the macrophage markers, CD11b (p < 0.001) and CD14 (p < 0.010). Despite this, THP-1 cells exposed to 1,25D alone did not adopt the morphological and expression characteristics associated with macrophages. PMA was required to produce these characteristics, which were found to be more pronounced in the presence of 1,25D. Both PMA- and PMA with 1,25Ddifferentiated THP-1 cells were capable of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization, though the gene expression of polarization-associated markers was most pronounced in PMA with 1,25Ddifferentiated THP-1 cells. Moreover, the combination of PMA with 1,25D appeared to support the process of commitment to a particular polarization state.
人单核细胞 THP-1 细胞系是研究单核细胞向巨噬细胞分化的最常用体外模型。尽管该模型被广泛应用,但使用佛波醇 12-肉豆蔻酸 13-乙酸酯 (PMA) 或 1,25-二羟维生素 D (1,25D) 的分化方案在不同研究之间差异很大。鉴于分化方案的差异有可能影响产生的巨噬细胞的特征,我们旨在通过评估形态变化以及基因和细胞表面巨噬细胞标志物表达来评估三种不同 THP-1 分化方案的效果。THP-1 细胞用 5 nM PMA、10 nM 1,25D 或两者的组合进行分化,然后进行休息期。结果表明,所有三种方案均显著增加了巨噬细胞标志物 CD11b(p<0.001)和 CD14(p<0.010)的表达。尽管如此,单独用 1,25D 处理的 THP-1 细胞并未表现出与巨噬细胞相关的形态和表达特征。需要 PMA 才能产生这些特征,而在存在 1,25D 的情况下,这些特征更为明显。PMA 和 PMA 与 1,25D 分化的 THP-1 细胞均能够进行 M1 和 M2 巨噬细胞极化,尽管与极化相关标志物的基因表达在 PMA 与 1,25D 分化的 THP-1 细胞中最为明显。此外,PMA 与 1,25D 的组合似乎支持向特定极化状态的承诺过程。