Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;108:437-451. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.027. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
The unibody bifurcated aortic endograft (AFX/AFX2) has emerged as a treatment option for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of the unibody endograft.
A literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Studies assessing the unibody endograft for AAA repair between 2014 and 2023 were included. The defined primary outcomes were the incidences of type I, II, and III endoleaks. The secondary outcomes were access site problems, aneurysm-related mortality, aneurysm rupture, all-cause mortality, aneurysm sac growth, limb occlusion, stent graft migration, and technical success rate.
Fourteen studies including 12 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 10 studies with 12,690 patients that reported the measured outcomes, and excluded 4 studies that did not. Type II endoleaks had the highest incidence of 12% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-20%), followed by type III endoleaks with an incidence of 3% (95% CI: 1-5%). The incidence of type I endoleaks was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%). A subgroup analysis by follow-up duration showed that type II endoleak incidence was higher after 1 to 2 years of follow-up than 3 to 4 years of follow-up. The incidence of aneurysmal mortality was 2% (95% CI: 0-7%), limb occlusion was 1% (95% CI: 0-1%), stent graft migration was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%), aneurysmal rupture was 6% (95% CI: 2-11%), access site problems were 7% (95% CI: 2-13%), aneurysm sac growth was 2% (95% CI: 0-4%), all-cause mortality was 21% (95% CI: 4-38%), and technical success rate was 100% (95% CI: 98-100%).
The unibody endograft is a safe and minimally invasive approach for AAA repair. However, potential complications necessitate close patient follow-up after the intervention.
一体式分叉主动脉覆膜支架(AFX/AFX2)已成为治疗腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的一种选择。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估一体式覆膜支架的安全性。
在 Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus、Web of Science 和 PubMed 中进行文献检索。纳入 2014 年至 2023 年间评估一体式覆膜支架治疗 AAA 的研究。定义的主要结局为 I 型、II 型和 III 型内漏的发生率。次要结局为入路问题、AAA 相关死亡率、AAA 破裂、全因死亡率、AAA 囊腔生长、肢体闭塞、支架移植物迁移和技术成功率。
共纳入 14 项研究,其中包括 12 项观察性研究和 2 项随机对照试验。荟萃分析纳入了 10 项研究,共 12690 例患者报告了测量结果,排除了 4 项未报告结果的研究。II 型内漏的发生率最高,为 12%(95%置信区间[CI]:4-20%),其次是 III 型内漏,发生率为 3%(95% CI:1-5%)。I 型内漏的发生率为 1%(95% CI:0-2%)。根据随访时间的亚组分析显示,1-2 年随访后 II 型内漏的发生率高于 3-4 年随访。AAA 相关死亡率为 2%(95% CI:0-7%),肢体闭塞发生率为 1%(95% CI:0-1%),支架移植物迁移发生率为 1%(95% CI:0-2%),AAA 破裂发生率为 6%(95% CI:2-11%),入路问题发生率为 7%(95% CI:2-13%),AAA 囊腔生长发生率为 2%(95% CI:0-4%),全因死亡率为 21%(95% CI:4-38%),技术成功率为 100%(95% CI:98-100%)。
一体式覆膜支架是治疗 AAA 的一种安全、微创的方法。然而,介入治疗后需要密切随访患者,以避免潜在的并发症。