Suppr超能文献

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和人绒毛膜促性腺激素(双重扳机)联合应用于 IVF/ICSI 周期可增加患者的优质胚胎数量。

Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG (double trigger) for final oocyte maturation increases the number of top-quality embryos in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Ovarian Res. 2024 Jul 3;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13048-024-01465-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The utilization of a double trigger, involving the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation, is emerging as a novel approach in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). This protocol involves administering GnRH-a and hCG 40 and 34 h prior to ovum pick-up (OPU), respectively. This treatment modality has been implemented in patients with low/poor oocytes yield. This study aimed to determine whether the double trigger could improve the number of top-quality embryos (TQEs) in patients with fewer than three TQEs.

METHODS

The stimulation characteristics of 35 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were analyzed. These cycles were triggered by the combination of hCG and GnRHa (double trigger cycles) and compared to the same patients' previous IVF attempt, which utilized the hCG trigger (hCG trigger control cycles). The analysis involved cases who were admitted to our reproductive center between January 2018 and December 2022. In the hCG trigger control cycles, all 35 patients had fewer than three TQEs.

RESULTS

Patients who received the double trigger cycles yielded a significantly higher number of 2PN cleavage embryos (3.54 ± 3.37 vs. 2.11 ± 2.15, P = 0.025), TQEs ( 2.23 ± 2.05 vs. 0.89 ± 0.99, P < 0.001), and a simultaneously higher proportion of the number of cleavage stage embryos (53.87% ± 31.38% vs. 39.80% ± 29.60%, P = 0.043), 2PN cleavage stage embryos (43.89% ± 33.01% vs. 27.22% ± 27.13%, P = 0.014), and TQEs (27.05% ± 26.26% vs. 14.19% ± 19.76%, P = 0.019) to the number of oocytes retrieved compared with the hCG trigger control cycles, respectively. The double trigger cycles achieved higher rates of cumulative clinical pregnancy (20.00% vs. 2.86%, P = 0.031), cumulative persistent pregnancy (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and cumulative live birth (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) per stimulation cycle compared with the hCG trigger control cycles.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 h prior to OPU, respectively (double trigger) may be suggested as a valuable new regimen for treating patients with low TQE yield in previous hCG trigger IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

摘要

背景

在控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH)期间,使用双重触发剂,即促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)和人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)共同给药以实现卵母细胞的最终成熟,这是 GnRH 拮抗剂(GnRH-ant)方案中的一种新方法。该方案涉及在取卵(OPU)前 40 和 34 小时分别给予 GnRH-a 和 hCG。这种治疗方式已经在低/卵子产量较差的患者中实施。本研究旨在确定双重触发是否可以增加少于三个优质胚胎(TQE)的患者的 TQE 数量。

方法

分析了 35 个体外受精(IVF)周期的刺激特征。这些周期通过 hCG 和 GnRHa 的联合触发(双重触发周期),并与同一患者之前使用 hCG 触发的 IVF 尝试(hCG 触发对照周期)进行比较。分析涉及在 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间到我们生殖中心就诊的患者。在 hCG 触发对照周期中,所有 35 名患者的 TQE 少于三个。

结果

接受双重触发周期的患者产生了更多的 2PN 卵裂胚胎(3.54±3.37 对 2.11±2.15,P=0.025)、TQE(2.23±2.05 对 0.89±0.99,P<0.001),并且同时具有更高比例的卵裂期胚胎数量(53.87%±31.38%对 39.80%±29.60%,P=0.043)、2PN 卵裂期胚胎(43.89%±33.01%对 27.22%±27.13%,P=0.014)和 TQE(27.05%±26.26%对 14.19%±19.76%,P=0.019),与 hCG 触发对照周期相比,每个取卵数获得的胚胎数。与 hCG 触发对照周期相比,双重触发周期实现了更高的累积临床妊娠率(20.00%对 2.86%,P=0.031)、累积持续妊娠率(14.29%对 0%,P<0.001)和累积活产率(14.29%对 0%,P<0.001)每个刺激周期。

结论

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和 hCG 分别在 OPU 前 40 和 34 小时共同给药以实现卵母细胞的最终成熟(双重触发),可作为治疗之前 hCG 触发 IVF/胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)周期中 TQE 产量低的患者的有价值的新方案。

相似文献

3
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
4
GnRH agonist versus HCG triggering in different IVF/ICSI cycles of same patients: a retrospective study.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;40(6):837-842. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1674262. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG, for final oocyte maturation (double trigger), in patients with low proportion of mature oocytes.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Feb;31(2):145-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.978850. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Does double trigger (GnRH-agonist + hCG) improve outcome in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET cycle? A pilot study.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Jul;35(7):628-630. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1576621. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
7
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub3.
9
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of hCG trigger versus dual trigger on reproductive outcomes in elderly infertile women: a retrospective cohort study.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 28;16:1580610. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1580610. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

5
Effect of a "Dual Trigger" Using a GnRH Agonist and hCG on the Cumulative Live-Birth Rate for Normal Responders in GnRH-Antagonist Cycles.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 25;8:683210. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.683210. eCollection 2021.
6
7
Dual trigger in normally-responding assisted reproductive technology patients increases the number of top-quality embryos.
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2020 Dec;47(4):300-305. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2020.03804. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Comparative study between single versus dual trigger for poor responders in GnRH-antagonist ICSI cycles: A randomized controlled study.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):395-400. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13405. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验