State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China.
Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kensington, Sydney, 2052, New South Wales, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Dec;99(6):1909-1926. doi: 10.1111/brv.13104. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
Woody plants are encroaching across terrestrial ecosystems globally, and this has dramatic effects on how these systems function and the livelihoods of producers who rely on the land to support livestock production. Consequently, the removal of woody plants is promoted widely in the belief that it will reinstate former grasslands or open savanna. Despite this popular management approach to encroachment, we still have a relatively poor understanding of the effects of removal on society, and of alternative management practices that could balance the competing needs of pastoral production, biodiversity conservation and cultural values. This information is essential for maintaining both ecological and societal benefits in encroached systems under predicted future climate changes. In this review, we provide a comprehensive synthesis of the social-ecological perspectives of woody encroachment based on recent studies and global meta-analyses by assessing the ecological impacts of encroachment and its effects on sustainable development goals (SDGs) when woody plants are retained and when they are removed. We propose a working definition of woody encroachment based on species- and community-level characteristics; such a definition is needed to evaluate accurately the effects of encroachment. We show that encroachment is a natural process of succession rather than a sign of degradation, with encroachment resulting in an overall 8% increase in ecosystem multifunctionality. Removing woody plants can increase herbaceous plant richness, biomass and cover, but at the expense of biocrust cover. The effectiveness of woody plant removal depends on plant identity, and where, when and how they are removed. Under current management practices, either removal or retention of woody plants can induce trade-offs among ecosystem services, with no management practice maximising all SDGs [e.g. SDG2 (end hunger), SDG13 (climate change), SDG 15 (combat desertification)]. Given that encroachment of woody plants is likely to increase under future predicted hotter and drier climates, alternative management options such as carbon farming and ecotourism could be effective land uses for areas affected by encroachment.
木本植物正在全球范围内侵入陆地生态系统,这对这些系统的功能以及依赖土地支持畜牧业生产的生产者的生计产生了巨大影响。因此,广泛提倡去除木本植物,因为人们相信这将恢复以前的草原或开阔的热带稀树草原。尽管这种普遍的管理方法可以遏制入侵,但我们仍然对去除木本植物对社会的影响以及可以平衡畜牧业生产、生物多样性保护和文化价值之间竞争需求的替代管理实践知之甚少。在预测的未来气候变化下,保持入侵系统的生态和社会效益,需要这些信息。在这篇综述中,我们通过评估木本植物入侵的生态影响及其对可持续发展目标(SDGs)的影响,综合了基于近期研究和全球元分析的木本植物入侵的社会-生态观点,在保留和去除木本植物时,SDGs 可能会受到影响。我们提出了一个基于物种和群落水平特征的木本植物入侵的工作定义;需要这样的定义来准确评估入侵的影响。我们表明,入侵是一个自然的演替过程,而不是退化的迹象,入侵导致生态系统多功能性整体增加 8%。去除木本植物可以增加草本植物的丰富度、生物量和覆盖度,但以生物结皮覆盖度为代价。木本植物去除的有效性取决于植物的身份,以及它们在哪里、何时以及如何被去除。在当前的管理实践下,无论是去除还是保留木本植物,都可能导致生态系统服务之间产生权衡,没有一种管理实践可以最大限度地实现所有可持续发展目标[例如,可持续发展目标 2(消除饥饿)、可持续发展目标 13(应对气候变化)、可持续发展目标 15(防治荒漠化)]。鉴于未来预测的更热、更干燥的气候下木本植物的入侵可能会增加,碳农业和生态旅游等替代管理选项可能是受入侵影响地区的有效土地利用方式。