Wang Xu, Ding Qixin, Li Yuefang, Li Tianshu, Li Yakun, Yin Jialin, Zhuang Weisheng
School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1374395. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1374395. eCollection 2024.
Executive dysfunction is a core symptom of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), which seriously affects patients' prognosis. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of rTMS on executive function in VCI.
The databases selected for this study included Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM). The screening times were conducted from the time of library construction until August 23, 2023. The inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on rTMS for VCI, which include executive function scores. The primary metrics were executive subscale scores of the Cognitive Comprehensive Scale and total scores of the Executive Specificity Scale. The secondary metrics were subscale scores of the Executive Specificity Scale. The quality of each eligible study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis and bias analysis were performed using Stata (version 16.0) and RevMan (version 5.3).
A total of 20 high-quality clinical RCTs with 1,049 samples were included in this paper. The findings from the primary outcomes revealed that within the rTMS group, there were significantly higher scores observed for the executive sub-item on the cognitive composite scale (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.77-1.08, < 0.00001, = 14%) and the total score on the executive specific scale (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.44-0.94, < 0.00001, = 0%) compared to the control group. As for the secondary outcome measures, as shown by the Trail Making Test-A (time) (MD = -35.75, 95% CI = -68.37 to -3.12, = 0.03, = 55%), the Stroop-C card (time) (SMD = -0.46, 95% CI = -0.86 to -0.06, = 0.02, = 0%) and the Stroop-C card (correct number) (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.04-0.94, = 0.03, = 0%), the experimental group shorts time and enhances accuracy of executive task in comparison to the control group. Subgroup analysis of the main outcome demonstrated that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), higher frequency, lower intensity, longer duration, and combined comprehensive therapy exhibited superior efficacy.
rTMS is effective in the treatment of the executive function of VCI. The present study has some limitations, so multi-center, large-sample, objective indicators and parameters are needed to further explore in the future.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023459669.
执行功能障碍是血管性认知障碍(VCI)的核心症状,严重影响患者预后。本文旨在探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对VCI患者执行功能的有效性。
本研究选取的数据库包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)、万方、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)。检索时间从建库至2023年8月23日。本荟萃分析的纳入标准为关于rTMS治疗VCI的随机对照试验(RCT),且包含执行功能评分。主要指标为认知综合量表的执行子量表评分和执行特异性量表总分。次要指标为执行特异性量表的子量表评分。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估每项合格研究的质量。使用Stata(16.0版)和RevMan(5.3版)进行荟萃分析和偏倚分析。
本文共纳入20项高质量临床RCT,共1049个样本。主要结局结果显示,与对照组相比,rTMS组在认知综合量表上的执行子项得分(标准化均数差[SMD]=0.93,95%置信区间[CI]=0.77 - 1.08,P<0.00001,I²=14%)和执行特异性量表总分(SMD=0.69,95%CI=0.44 - 0.94,P<0.00001,I²=0%)显著更高。至于次要结局指标,如连线测验A(时间)(平均差[MD]= - 35.75,95%CI= - 68.37至 - 3.12,P=0.03,I²=55%)、Stroop - C卡片(时间)(SMD= - 0.46,95%CI= - 0.86至 - 0.06,P=0.02,I²=0%)和Stroop - C卡片(正确数)(SMD=0.49,95%CI=0.04 - 0.94,P=0.03,I²=0%),与对照组相比,实验组执行任务时间缩短且准确性提高。主要结局的亚组分析表明,间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)、较高频率、较低强度、较长持续时间以及联合综合治疗显示出更好的疗效。
rTMS对VCI的执行功能治疗有效。本研究存在一定局限性,未来需要多中心、大样本、客观指标和参数进一步探索。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,CRD42023459669