Impact of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures on Patient Management: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial bloodstream infections associated with intravascular catheters pose significant financial burden, morbidity, and mortality. There is much debate about whether or not blood cultures should be drawn through central venous catheters, and while guidelines advocate for catheter-drawn cultures when catheter infection is suspected, there is variable practice in this regard.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study assessing episodes of positive catheter-drawn blood cultures with concomitant negative percutaneously-drawn cultures in tertiary care hospitals in the United States and Spain.

RESULTS

We identified 143 episodes in 122 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Thirty percent of such episodes revealed growth of potential pathogens such as . Overall, 21% of follow-up percutaneously-drawn blood cultures obtained within 48 hours revealed growth of the same microbe after an episode of positive catheter-drawn blood cultures with negative concomitant percutaneously-drawn cultures (33% when potential pathogens were isolated; 16% when common skin contaminants were isolated). Patients with cultures growing pathogenic organisms were more likely to receive targeted antimicrobial therapy and have their catheters removed sooner.

CONCLUSIONS

Many episodes of positive catheter-drawn blood cultures with concomitant negative percutaneously-drawn cultures lead to growth from percutaneously-drawn follow-up blood cultures. Thus, such initial discordant results should not be disregarded. Our findings advocate for a nuanced approach to blood culture interpretation, emphasizing the value of catheter-drawn blood cultures in clinical decision making and management.