Inomata Minehiko, Kawashima Yosuke, Saito Ryota, Morinaga Daisuke, Nogawa Hitomi, Sato Masamichi, Suzuki Yohei, Yanagisawa Satoru, Kikuchi Takashi, Jingu Daisuke, Yoshimura Naruo, Harada Toshiyuki, Miyauchi Eisaku
First Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024 Jul 3;4(4):515-520. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10357. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, higher tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, and information on the comparison between afatinib and osimertinib in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC is scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC to compare the effectiveness of afatinib and osimertinib. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were included in the study. The Cox proportion hazard model was adjusted for age, sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and brain metastasis, revealing that there was no significant difference in risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-1.53] or death (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.73) between afatinib and osimertinib. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration and overall survival after the treatment with afatinib or osimertinib were similar in patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the present study.
Anticancer Res. 2019-7
Anticancer Res. 2022-4