Suppr超能文献

急诊医生和护士对疗养院居民紧急呼叫充足性的认知:一项非干预性前瞻性研究。

Emergency physicians' and nurses' perception on the adequacy of emergency calls for nursing home residents: a non-interventional prospective study.

作者信息

Lemoyne Sabine, Van Bastelaere Joanne, Nackaerts Sofie, Verdonck Philip, Monsieurs Koenraad, Schnaubelt Sebastian

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 19;11:1396858. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1396858. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A considerable percentage of daily emergency calls are for nursing home residents. With the ageing of the overall European population, an increase in emergency calls and interventions in nursing homes (NH) is to be expected. A proportion of these interventions and hospital transfers may be preventable and could be considered as inappropriate by prehospital emergency medical personnel. The study aimed to understand Belgian emergency physicians' and emergency nurses' perspectives on emergency calls and interventions in NHs and investigate factors contributing to their perception of inappropriateness.

METHODS

An exploratory non-interventional prospective study was conducted in Belgium among emergency physicians and emergency nurses, currently working in prehospital emergency medicine. Electronic questionnaires were sent out in September, October and November 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the overall results, as well as to compare the answers between emergency physicians and emergency nurses about certain topics.

RESULTS

A total of 114 emergency physicians and 78 nurses responded to the survey. The mean age was 38 years with a mean working experience of 10 years in prehospital healthcare. Nursing home staff were perceived as understaffed and lacking in competence, with an impact on patient care especially during nights and weekends. General practitioners were perceived as insufficiently involved in the patient's care, as well as often unavailable in times of need, leading to activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and transfers of nursing home residents to the Emergency Department (ED). Advance directives were almost never available at EMS interventions and transfers were often not in accordance with the patient's wishes. Palliative care and pain treatment were perceived as insufficient. Emergency physicians and nurses felt mostly disappointed and frustrated. Additionally, differences in perception were noted between emergency physicians and nurses regarding certain topics. Emergency nurses were more convinced that the nursing home physician should be available 24/7 and that transfers could be avoided if nursing home staff had more authority regarding medical interventions. Emergency nurses were also more under the impression that pain management was inadequate, and emergency physicians were more afraid of the medical implications of doing too little during interventions than emergency nurses. Suggestions to reduce the number of EMS interventions were more general practitioner involvement (82%), better nursing home staff education/competences (77%), more nursing home staff (67%), mobile palliative care support teams (65%) and mobile geriatric nursing intervention teams (52%).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

EMS interventions in nursing homes were almost never seen as necessary or indicated by emergency physicians and nurses, with the appropriate EMS level almost never being activated. The following key issues were found: shortages in numbers and competence of nursing home staff, insufficient primary care due to the unavailability of the general practitioner as well as a lack of involvement in patient care, and an absence of readily available advance directives. General practitioners should be more involved in the decision to call the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and to transfer nursing home residents to the Emergency Department. Healthcare workers should strive for vigilance regarding the patients' wishes. The emotional burden of deciding on an avoidable hospital admission of nursing home residents, perhaps out of fear for medico-legal consequences if doing too little, leaves the emergency physicians and nurses frustrated and disappointed. Improvements in nursing home staffing, more acute and chronic general practitioner consultations, and mobile geriatric and palliative care support teams are potential solutions. Further research should focus on the structural improvement of the above-mentioned shortcomings.

摘要

引言

日常紧急呼叫中有相当一部分是关于养老院居民的。随着欧洲总人口的老龄化,预计养老院的紧急呼叫和干预将会增加。这些干预措施和医院转运中的一部分可能是可以预防的,并且可能被院前急救医疗人员视为不适当的。该研究旨在了解比利时急诊医生和急诊护士对养老院紧急呼叫和干预的看法,并调查导致他们认为不适当的因素。

方法

在比利时对目前从事院前急救医学工作的急诊医生和急诊护士进行了一项探索性非干预性前瞻性研究。2023年9月、10月和11月发放了电子问卷。使用描述性统计分析总体结果,以及比较急诊医生和急诊护士在某些主题上的答案。

结果

共有114名急诊医生和78名护士回复了调查。平均年龄为38岁,院前医疗工作平均经验为10年。养老院工作人员被认为人员不足且缺乏能力,这对患者护理产生了影响,尤其是在夜间和周末。全科医生被认为对患者护理的参与不足,并且在需要时常常无法提供帮助,导致紧急医疗服务(EMS)启动以及养老院居民被转运至急诊科(ED)。在EMS干预时几乎从未有预先指示,并且转运往往不符合患者的意愿。姑息治疗和疼痛治疗被认为不足。急诊医生和护士大多感到失望和沮丧。此外,在某些主题上急诊医生和护士的看法存在差异。急诊护士更确信养老院医生应随时待命,并且如果养老院工作人员在医疗干预方面有更多权力,转运是可以避免的。急诊护士也更觉得疼痛管理不足,并且急诊医生比急诊护士更担心在干预过程中做得太少会带来医疗后果。减少EMS干预次数的建议包括更多全科医生的参与(82%)、更好的养老院工作人员教育/能力(77%)、更多的养老院工作人员(67%)以及移动姑息治疗支持团队(65%)和移动老年护理干预团队(52%)。

讨论与结论

急诊医生和护士几乎从不认为养老院的EMS干预是必要的或有指征的,并且几乎从未启动适当的EMS级别。发现了以下关键问题:养老院工作人员数量和能力短缺、由于全科医生无法提供服务导致初级护理不足以及缺乏对患者护理的参与,以及缺乏随时可用的预先指示。全科医生应更多地参与决定呼叫紧急医疗服务(EMS)以及将养老院居民转运至急诊科。医护人员应努力关注患者的意愿。决定将养老院居民不必要地收治入院所带来的情感负担,可能是出于担心做得太少会带来医疗法律后果,这让急诊医生和护士感到沮丧和失望。改善养老院人员配备、增加急性和慢性疾病的全科医生会诊以及移动老年和姑息治疗支持团队是潜在的解决方案。进一步的研究应侧重于上述缺点的结构性改进。

相似文献

3
4
Paramedics' Perspectives on the Hospital Transfers of Nursing Home Residents-A Qualitative Focus Group Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113778.
8
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of emergency medical responses to nursing homes in a local area of Germany.
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01306-9.
3
Hybrid emergency care at the home for patients - A multiple case study.
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01087-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile Medical Teams are Often Over-Qualified.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Oct;38(5):555-563. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006155. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Unplanned hospital transfers from nursing homes: who is involved in the transfer decision? Results from the HOMERN study.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Aug;33(8):2231-2241. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01751-5. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
7
Paramedics' Perspectives on the Hospital Transfers of Nursing Home Residents-A Qualitative Focus Group Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113778.
9
A Systematic Review of Nursing Home Palliative Care Interventions: Characteristics and Outcomes.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 May;21(5):583-596.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.11.015. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
Adverse Events in Long-term Care Residents Transitioning From Hospital Back to Nursing Home.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1254-1261. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验