Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; Northwestern Quality Improvement, Research, & Education in Surgery (NQUIRES), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; Northwestern Quality Improvement, Research, & Education in Surgery (NQUIRES), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep;28(9):1512-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.025. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
For gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), neoadjuvant imatinib is most often reserved for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction, multivisceral involvement, or limited metastatic disease. Whether localized gastric GISTs benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unknown. We sought to examine factors associated with NAT utilization for localized gastric GISTs and evaluate implications on survival.
The National Cancer Database identified patients with localized gastric GISTs treated with NAT (2010-2020), excluding tumors extending beyond the gastric wall, located in the cardia, or with metastatic disease. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics of NAT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).
Of 7203 patients, 762 (10.6%) received NAT followed by resection. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with NAT use (<2.0 cm vs 2.0-5.0 cm [odds ratio {OR}, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.19-3.47; P = .010] vs >5 cm [OR, 16.87; 95% CI, 10.02-28.40; P < .001]). After propensity score matching, 1506 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 46.0 months vs 43.0 months for resection (P = .059), which was independently predictive of improved survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .041). Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed no survival differences for tumors <2.0 cm or from 2.0 to 5.0 cm. Median OS was higher for tumors > 5.0 cm treated with NAT (NAT, 45.4 months [IQR, 29.5-65.9] vs upfront resection, 42.3 months [IQR 26.9-62.8]) and associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .040).
Although patients who received NAT had improved survival, this was primarily due to tumors >5.0 cm. Expanding NAT selection criteria to include localized gastric GISTs >5.0 cm may improve outcomes and warrants investigation through clinical trials.
对于胃胃肠间质瘤(GISTs),新辅助伊马替尼通常仅用于胃食管交界处附近的肿瘤、多脏器受累或有限的转移性疾病。局限性胃 GIST 是否受益于新辅助治疗(NAT)尚不清楚。我们旨在研究与局限性胃 GIST 接受 NAT 相关的因素,并评估其对生存的影响。
国家癌症数据库确定了接受 NAT(2010-2020 年)治疗的局限性胃 GIST 患者,排除了超出胃壁、位于贲门或有转移疾病的肿瘤。多变量逻辑回归评估了 NAT 使用的特征。在 1:1 倾向评分匹配后,使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和多变量 Cox 回归评估总生存(OS)。
在 7203 名患者中,762 名(10.6%)接受了 NAT 后再进行切除术。多变量分析显示,肿瘤大小增加与 NAT 应用相关(<2.0cm 与 2.0-5.0cm[比值比{OR},2.03;95%置信区间{CI},1.19-3.47;P=0.010]与>5cm[OR,16.87;95%CI,10.02-28.40;P<0.001])。在进行倾向评分匹配后,仍有 1506 名患者。NAT 的中位 OS 为 46.0 个月,而切除术为 43.0 个月(P=0.059),多变量分析显示这独立地预测了生存的改善(风险比[HR],0.89;95%CI,0.80-0.99;P=0.041)。根据肿瘤大小的亚组分析,<2.0cm 或 2.0-5.0cm 的肿瘤之间无生存差异。肿瘤>5.0cm 接受 NAT 治疗的患者中位 OS 更高(NAT,45.4 个月[IQR,29.5-65.9]vs upfront 切除术,42.3 个月[IQR,26.9-62.8]),且多变量分析显示与生存改善相关(HR,0.88;95%CI,0.78-0.99;P=0.040)。
尽管接受 NAT 的患者生存改善,但这主要是由于肿瘤>5.0cm。扩大 NAT 选择标准,纳入局限性胃 GISTs>5.0cm,可能改善结局,并需要通过临床试验进行研究。