Lv Ya-Nan, Zhang Wen-Tao, Wang Ying, Wang Gang
Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center, Xuzhou, China.
Department of Radiology, The First Hospital, Zhangjiakou, China.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Jun;19(2):178-186. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2024.139198. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
In patients with pulmonary nodules (PNs), computed tomography (CT)-guided localization is commonly performed prior to the resection of these nodules through video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
To evaluate the relative clinical efficacy of coil and anchored needle (AN) insertion as approaches to preoperative CT-guided PN localization.
This single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial (registration number: NCT05183945) enrolled consecutive patients from January 2022 to July 2022, assigning these patients at random to undergo either coil or AN localization prior to VATS. Efficacy and safety outcomes in these two groups were then compared.
This study enrolled in total 100 patients with 120 PNs who were assigned at random to the coil (patients = 50; PNs = 60) and AN (patients = 50; PNs = 60) localization groups. The respective technical success rates for coil and AN localization were 98.3% (59/60) and 100% (60/60), with no significant difference between the groups (p = 1.000). The coil group had a significantly longer median duration of localization relative to the AN group (16.0 min vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Similar rates of localization-related pneumothorax (8.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.715) and pulmonary hemorrhage (5.0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.110) were observed in both groups. In addition, the VATS resection procedures achieved 100% technical success rates in both of these localization groups.
Both coil- and AN-based localization approaches can be successfully employed to localize PNs prior to VATS resection, with the AN localization procedure requiring less time to complete on average as compared to the coil-based approach.
在肺结节(PN)患者中,在通过电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)切除这些结节之前,通常会进行计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下的定位。
评估线圈和锚定针(AN)插入作为术前CT引导下PN定位方法的相对临床疗效。
这项单中心、前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照试验(注册号:NCT05183945)纳入了2022年1月至2022年7月连续的患者,将这些患者随机分配在VATS之前接受线圈或AN定位。然后比较这两组的疗效和安全性结果。
本研究共纳入100例有120个PN的患者,随机分配到线圈(患者 = 50;PN = 60)和AN(患者 = 50;PN = 60)定位组。线圈和AN定位的各自技术成功率分别为98.3%(59/60)和100%(60/60),两组之间无显著差异(p = 1.000)。与AN组相比,线圈组的中位定位持续时间明显更长(16.0分钟对8.0分钟,p < 0.001)。两组中定位相关气胸(8.3%对5.0%,p = 0.715)和肺出血(5.0%对13.3%,p = 0.110)的发生率相似。此外,在这两个定位组中,VATS切除手术的技术成功率均达到100%。
基于线圈和基于AN的定位方法均可成功用于VATS切除术前PN的定位,与基于线圈的方法相比,AN定位程序平均完成时间更短。