do Prado Cássio Roberto Arantes, Pessoa Matheus Henrique de Oliveira, Dos Santos Lucas da Silva, da Cruz Aline da Silva Xavier, Dinelli Luís Rogério, Bogado André Luiz
Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais do Pontal, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Ituiutaba, Minas Gerais 38304-402, Brazil.
Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Av. João Naves de Avila 2121, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais 38400-902, Brazil.
ACS Omega. 2024 Jun 14;9(26):28989-28999. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04098. eCollection 2024 Jul 2.
This work aims to study the interaction between cationic metal complexes (M ) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs ). The M complexes were chosen from previous works described in the literature and were synthesized as defined. For example, they are as follows: = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(py); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(vpy); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(mepy); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(bpy); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy); = [Fe(bipy)]Cl; = Ru(bipy); = TPyP{RuCl(dppb)(bipy)}; and = RuCl(-cymene)(Dipmp). The interactions between M and AuNPs were carried out using conductometry and UV-vis spectroscopy. These experiments allowed determination of kinetic parameters, revealing three different steps in the interaction process: induction time, flocculation, and agglomeration. The self-assembly between M and AuNPs was investigated using three different models of binding site, namely, Langmuir or direct plot, Benesi-Hildebrand, and Scatchard. These models provide the fraction of total binding sites occupied (θ), the formation constant ( ), which is dependent on the temperature and geometric structure of each group of M , and the Gibbs free energy of reaction (Δ ), which was negative for each pair of M and AuNPs , revealing a spontaneous agglomeration process. The Hill coefficient () was 1 for almost all complexes, indicating that agglomeration is an independent process, except for , where = 2, suggesting a positive propensity to bind onto the AuNPs surface. The models have confirmed a noncovalent interaction between these species. The relative error in site binding does not show any variation with changes in the temperature, but a fine-tuning of the value to 1.00 was observed with the increase of the temperature. Finally, the reduction reaction of the 4-nitrophenolate anion (4-NP) by NaBH catalyzed by AuNPs was used in the presence of M as an evaluation test to show how the M species will disturb the 4-NP binding site on the surface of gold nanoparticles.
本工作旨在研究阳离子金属配合物(M )与金纳米颗粒(AuNPs )之间的相互作用。M 配合物选自文献中描述的先前工作,并按规定合成。例如,它们如下: = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(py); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(vpy); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(mepy); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy)(bpy); = RuCl(dppb)(bipy); = [Fe(bipy)]Cl; = Ru(bipy); = TPyP{RuCl(dppb)(bipy)};以及 = RuCl( - 异丙苯)(Dipmp)。M 与AuNPs 之间的相互作用通过电导测定法和紫外 - 可见光谱法进行。这些实验能够确定动力学参数,揭示了相互作用过程中的三个不同步骤:诱导时间、絮凝和团聚。使用三种不同的结合位点模型研究了M 与AuNPs 之间的自组装,即朗缪尔或直接作图法、贝内西 - 希尔德布兰德法和斯卡查德法。这些模型提供了被占据的总结合位点分数(θ)、形成常数( ),其取决于每组M 的温度和几何结构,以及反应的吉布斯自由能(Δ ),对于每对M 和AuNPs ,该值均为负,表明存在自发团聚过程。几乎所有配合物的希尔系数( )均为1,表明团聚是一个独立过程,除了 ,其 = 2,表明其在AuNPs 表面具有正的结合倾向。这些模型证实了这些物种之间的非共价相互作用。位点结合的相对误差不随温度变化而变化,但随着温度升高,观察到 值微调至1.00。最后,在M 存在的情况下,使用由AuNPs 催化的NaBH对4 - 硝基酚根阴离子(4 - NP)的还原反应作为评估测试,以显示M 物种将如何干扰金纳米颗粒表面上的4 - NP结合位点。