与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术相比,经皮腰椎椎间融合术的围手术期阿片类药物使用量更少:一项单机构、多外科医生的回顾性研究。
Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study.
作者信息
Shalita Chidyaonga, Wang Timothy, Dibble Christopher F, Adams Shawn W, Nelli Amanda, Sykes David, Tabarestani Troy, Bhowmik Subasish, Liu Beiyu, Jung Sin-Ho, Gulur Padma, Grossi Peter, Crutcher Clifford, Abd-El-Barr Muhammad M
机构信息
Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
出版信息
J Spine Surg. 2024 Jun 21;10(2):190-203. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-132. Epub 2024 May 17.
BACKGROUND
Ultra-minimally invasive percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion (percLIF) has been demonstrated to further minimize tissue trauma and has been associated with improved clinical outcomes including decreased blood loss, post-operative pain and length of stay when compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery. A single-institution retrospective study was conducted to investigate whether 1-level percLIF is associated with decreased narcotic consumption compared to 1-level MIS-TLIF in the first 24-hour following surgery.
METHODS
A retrospective study of patients undergoing either single-level percLIF or MIS-TLIF from January 2018 to December 2021. Opioid consumption in the 24-hour following surgery was converted into total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The primary outcome used univariate and multivariate regression analysis to compare MME consumption between the MIS-TLIF and percLIF groups. Secondary outcome variables included, estimated blood loss, total intraoperative MME, MME at discharge, MME at 30 days post-op, exiting nerve root injury, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visual analogue scale (VAS) score at handoff, time to first ambulation, distance ambulated post-operative day one and hospital length of stay.
RESULTS
A total of 51 patients (21 percLIF 30 MIS-TLIF) were included in the study. Univariate regression analysis revealed that on average patients who underwent percLIF had a 24-hour postoperative MME -50.8 mg (95% CI: -91.6, -10) lower than those who had MIS-TLIF (P=0.02). On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for sex and age, 24-hour postoperative MME closely failed to meet statistical significance (P=0.06) with an average of -40.8 mg (95% CI: -83.2, 1.6) MME in percLIF patients compared to MIS-TLIF. There was no statistically significant difference in MME between MIS-TLIF and percLIF at the time of discharge and at 30 days post-op.
CONCLUSIONS
In the setting of the current opioid epidemic in the United States and increased numbers of patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion, spine surgeons must continue to do their part helping reduce the need for opioid prescriptions for postoperative pain management. New "ultra-MIS" techniques such as percLIF allow surgeons to further decrease tissue trauma, which should lead to reduced need for post-operative narcotic requirements.
背景
与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)相比,超微创经皮腰椎椎间融合术(percLIF)已被证明能进一步减少组织创伤,并与改善临床结果相关,包括减少失血、术后疼痛和住院时间。一项单机构回顾性研究旨在调查与1级MIS-TLIF相比,1级percLIF在术后24小时内是否与减少麻醉药物使用量相关。
方法
对2018年1月至2021年12月期间接受单节段percLIF或MIS-TLIF手术的患者进行回顾性研究。将术后24小时内的阿片类药物使用量换算为总吗啡毫克当量(MME)。主要结局采用单因素和多因素回归分析比较MIS-TLIF组和percLIF组之间的MME使用量。次要结局变量包括估计失血量、术中总MME、出院时MME、术后30天MME、神经根损伤、术后麻醉恢复室(PACU)交接时视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、首次下床活动时间、术后第1天行走距离和住院时间。
结果
本研究共纳入51例患者(21例percLIF,30例MIS-TLIF)。单因素回归分析显示,平均而言,接受percLIF手术的患者术后24小时MME比接受MIS-TLIF手术的患者低50.8mg(95%CI:-91.6,-10)(P=0.02)。多因素分析中,在调整性别和年龄后,percLIF患者术后24小时MME与MIS-TLIF患者相比平均低40.8mg(95%CI:-83.2,1.6),接近但未达到统计学显著性(P=0.06)。MIS-TLIF组和percLIF组在出院时和术后30天的MME无统计学显著差异。
结论
在美国当前的阿片类药物流行背景下,以及接受腰椎椎间融合术的患者数量增加的情况下,脊柱外科医生必须继续尽自己的一份力量,帮助减少术后疼痛管理中阿片类药物处方的需求。新的“超微创”技术,如percLIF,使外科医生能够进一步减少组织创伤,这应该会导致术后对麻醉药物需求的减少。