*Ruhsan Moduruglu Adiguzel, DDS, PhD, assistant professor, Başkent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
Leyla Kerimova Kose, DDS, PhD, assistant professor, Başkent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
Oper Dent. 2024 Jul 1;49(4):432-442. doi: 10.2341/23-036-L.
To evaluate the shade-matching ability of single-shade resin-based composite restorations in different thicknesses using both instrumental and visual techniques.
Cavities with 4 mm diameter and 2 mm (n=96) or 3 mm (n=96) depth were prepared in acrylic incisor teeth of shades A2, A3, B3, and C2 and restored with three single-shade resin composites, Omnichroma (Tokuyama Dental America, Encinitas, CA, USA [OM]), Vittra APS Unique (FGM Dental Group, Joinville, SC, Brazil [VU]), Zenchroma (President Dental, Allershausen, Germany [ZC]), and a microhybrid resin composite (Filtek 3M Z250 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA [FZ]) of A2, A3, B3, and C2 shades. Readings were obtained using VITA Easyshade V spectrophotometer for the teeth and restorations. The CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) color difference formula was used, and the values were assessed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Forty-eight evaluators graded the shade match of 32 different specimens visually as (A) best shade match, (B) intermediate shade match, and (C) poor shade match.
FZ material achieved satisfactory matches for both thicknesses, across all shades, and OM material demonstrated statistically significant lower shade matches than the ZC and the FZ materials (p<0.05). VU exhibited poor shade match with the highest ΔE00 value on C2 shade. According to the visual examination, the best shade matches were observed for FZ on A3-shade and ZC on C2-shade teeth.
Shade matching for 2 mm and 3 mm-thick composite resin restorations is material- and tooth-shade dependent.
使用仪器和视觉技术评估不同厚度下单色调树脂基复合材料修复体的颜色匹配能力。
在丙烯酸切牙中制备直径为 4mm、深度为 2mm(n=96)或 3mm(n=96)的窝洞,并使用三种单色调树脂复合材料 Omnichroma(美国托卡米亚牙科公司,恩西尼塔斯[OM])、Vittra APS Unique(巴西 Joinville 的 FGM 牙科集团[VU])、Zenchroma(总统牙科,Allershausen,德国[ZC])和 A2、A3、B3 和 C2 色调的微混合树脂复合材料 Filtek 3M Z250 3M ESPE(明尼苏达州圣保罗的 3M ESPE[FZ])进行修复。使用 VITA Easyshade V 分光光度计对牙齿和修复体进行读数。使用 CIEDE2000(ΔE00)色差公式进行评估,并使用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行评估。48 名评估者通过视觉将 32 个不同样本的颜色匹配等级分为(A)最佳颜色匹配、(B)中等颜色匹配和(C)较差颜色匹配。
FZ 材料在两种厚度下,所有色调均达到了令人满意的匹配,而 OM 材料的颜色匹配明显低于 ZC 和 FZ 材料(p<0.05)。VU 在 C2 色调上表现出较差的颜色匹配,其ΔE00 值最高。根据视觉检查,FZ 在 A3 色调和 ZC 在 C2 色调的牙齿上表现出最佳的颜色匹配。
2mm 和 3mm 厚的复合树脂修复体的颜色匹配取决于材料和牙齿色调。