Liu Meng-Yi, Hsu Pei-Shan, Wu Chiu-Feng, Wu Yao-Kuang, Yang Mei-Chen, Su Wen-Lin, Tzeng I-Shiang, Lan Chou-Chin
Department of Nursing, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Yongyi Home Ventilator Care Center, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Apr 30;36(3):311-318. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_236_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
Endotracheal tube (ETT) intubation is a life-saving procedure in patients with respiratory failure. However, the presence of an ETT can cause significant discomfort. A tracheostomy tube is used to administer a mechanical ventilator, resulting in a more stable airway and fewer serious injuries. Noninvasive ventilators (NIPPVs) administer ventilation through masks and must be tightly fixed to the face. ETT, tracheostomy, and NIPPV are the most common methods of ventilator maintenance. However, these interventions often cause discomfort to patients. This study aimed to compare discomfort associated with ETT, tracheostomy, and NIPPV.
Forty-nine conscious patients with postextubation NIPPV and eight conscious patients who underwent postextubation tracheotomy were evaluated for discomfort. A questionnaire survey on discomfort was performed before and after NIPPV or tracheostomy. These patients reported their level of discomfort on a visual analog scale.
The levels of sore throat, nasal pain, body pain, activity limitation, respiratory discomfort, oral discomfort, difficulty coughing sputum, worry about respiratory tube disconnection, back pain, anxiety, worry about long-term admission, sleep disturbance, and general discomfort during ETT intubation were higher than during tracheostomy or NIPPV (all < 0.05). The mean level of discomfort was approximately 5-6 points (moderate) in patients with ETT and 2-3 points (mild) in patients with NIPPV or tracheostomy.
The level of discomfort was higher in patients who underwent ETT intubation than in those who underwent NIPPV or tracheostomy. However, the level of discomfort was similar between the patients with NIPPV and those who underwent tracheostomy.
气管插管是呼吸衰竭患者的一项挽救生命的操作。然而,气管插管的存在会引起明显不适。气管造口管用于连接机械通气,可使气道更稳定,严重损伤更少。无创通气通过面罩进行通气,必须紧密固定在面部。气管插管、气管造口术和无创通气是最常见的通气维持方法。然而,这些干预措施常常给患者带来不适。本研究旨在比较气管插管、气管造口术和无创通气相关的不适。
对49例拔管后使用无创通气的清醒患者和8例拔管后行气管切开术的清醒患者进行不适评估。在无创通气或气管造口术前后进行关于不适的问卷调查。这些患者通过视觉模拟量表报告他们的不适程度。
气管插管期间的咽痛、鼻痛、身体疼痛、活动受限、呼吸不适、口腔不适、咳痰困难、担心呼吸管断开、背痛、焦虑、担心长期住院、睡眠障碍和总体不适程度高于气管造口术或无创通气期间(均P<0.05)。气管插管患者的平均不适程度约为5 - 6分(中度),无创通气或气管造口术患者为2 - 3分(轻度)。
气管插管患者的不适程度高于无创通气或气管造口术患者。然而,无创通气患者和气管造口术患者的不适程度相似。