Brombosz Elizabeth W, Moore Linda W, Mobley Constance M, Kodali Sudha, Saharia Ashish, Hobeika Mark J, Connor Ashton A, Victor David W, Cheah Yee Lee, Simon Caroline J, Gaber Ahmed Osama, Ghobrial Rafik Mark
Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States.
Front Transplant. 2023 May 31;2:1181770. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1181770. eCollection 2023.
Liver retransplantation (reLT) has historically had inferior survival relative to primary liver transplant (LT). To improve outcomes after reLT, researchers have identified factors predicting overall (OS) and/or graft survival (GS) after reLT. This systematic review and random effects meta-analysis sought to summarize this literature to elucidate the strongest independent predictors of post-reLT.
A systematic review was conducted to identify manuscripts reporting factors affecting survival in multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Papers with overlapping cohorts were excluded.
All 25 included studies were retrospective, and 15 (60%) were single-center studies. Patients on pre-transplant ventilation (HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.56-6.20; = 0.001) and with high serum creatinine (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.87; = 0.002) had the highest mortality risk after reLT. Recipient age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, donor age, and cold ischemia time >12 h also conferred a significant risk of post-reLT death (all < 0.05). Factors affecting GS included donor age and retransplant interval (the time between LT and reLT; both < 0.05). OS is significantly higher when the retransplant interval is ≤7 days relative to 8-30 days ( = 0.04).
The meta-analysis was complicated by papers utilizing non-standardized cut-off values to group variables, which made between-study comparisons difficult. However, it did identify 7 variables that significantly impact survival after reLT, which could stimulate future research into improving post-reLT outcomes.
从历史上看,肝再次移植(reLT)的生存率低于初次肝移植(LT)。为了改善reLT后的预后,研究人员已经确定了预测reLT后总体生存率(OS)和/或移植物生存率(GS)的因素。本系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析旨在总结该文献,以阐明reLT后最强的独立预测因素。
进行系统评价,以识别在多变量Cox比例风险分析中报告影响生存率因素的手稿。排除有重叠队列的论文。
纳入的所有25项研究均为回顾性研究,其中15项(60%)为单中心研究。移植前接受通气的患者(HR,3.11;95%CI,1.56 - 6.20;P = 0.001)和血清肌酐水平高的患者(HR,1.46;95%CI,1.15 - 1.87;P = 0.002)在reLT后死亡风险最高。受者年龄、终末期肝病模型评分、供者年龄以及冷缺血时间>12小时也会使reLT后死亡风险显著增加(均P < 0.05)。影响GS的因素包括供者年龄和再次移植间隔(LT与reLT之间的时间;均P < 0.05)。与8 - 30天相比,再次移植间隔≤7天时OS显著更高(P = 0.04)。
由于论文使用非标准化的截断值对变量进行分组,使得研究间的比较变得困难,从而使荟萃分析变得复杂。然而,它确实确定了7个对reLT后生存率有显著影响的变量,这可能会激发未来改善reLT后预后的研究。