• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿兹夫定在中国 COVID-19 患者中的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Azvudine in Patients With COVID-19 in China: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China.

Medical Device Monitoring and Evaluation Department, National Center for ADR Monitoring, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Respir J. 2024 Jul;18(7):e13798. doi: 10.1111/crj.13798.

DOI:10.1111/crj.13798
PMID:38994643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11240111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Azvudine (FNC) is a novel small molecule antiviral drug for treating COVID-19 that is available only on the Chinese market. Despite being recommended for treating COVID-19 by the Chinese guidelines, its efficacy and safety are still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of FNC on COVID-19 outcomes and its safety.

METHODS

We followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to evaluate studies on the effectiveness of FNC in treating COVID-19 in China, focusing on mortality and overall outcomes. Additionally, its impact on the length of hospital stay (LOHS), time to first nucleic acid negative conversion (T-FNANC), and adverse events was evaluated. The inclusion criterion was that the studies were published from July 2021 to April 10, 2024. This study uses the ROBINS-I tool to assess bias risk and employs the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 24 retrospective studies involving a total of 11 830 patients. Low-certainty evidence revealed no significant difference in mortality (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.08) or LOHS (WMD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.83 to 0.35) between FNC and Paxlovid in COVID-19 patients. Low-certainty evidence shows that the T-FNANC was longer (WMD = 1.95, 95% CI: 0.36-3.53). Compared with the Paxlovid group, low-certainty evidence shows the FNC group exhibited a worse composite outcome (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.95) and fewer adverse events (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.85). Compared with supportive treatment, low certainty shows FNC significantly reduced the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74) and decreased the composite outcome (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.91), and very low certainty evidence shows significantly decreased the T-FNANC (WMD = -4.62, 95% CI: -8.08 to -1.15). However, in very low certainty, there was no significant difference in LOHS (WMD = -0.70, 95% CI: -3.32 to 1.91) or adverse events (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.48-8.17).

CONCLUSIONS

FNC appears to be a safe and potentially effective treatment for COVID-19 in China, but further research with larger, high-quality studies is necessary to confirm these findings. Due to the certainty of the evidence and the specific context of the studies conducted in China, caution should be exercised when considering whether the results are applicable worldwide.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO number: CRD42024520565.

摘要

背景

阿兹夫定(FNC)是一种新型的小分子抗病毒药物,用于治疗 COVID-19,仅在中国市场有售。尽管中国指南推荐用于治疗 COVID-19,但它的疗效和安全性仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估 FNC 对 COVID-19 结局的保护作用及其安全性。

方法

我们遵循 PRISMA 2020 指南,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)数据库,以评估 FNC 在中国治疗 COVID-19 的有效性研究,重点是死亡率和总体结局。此外,还评估了其对住院时间(LOHS)、首次核酸转阴时间(T-FNANC)和不良事件的影响。纳入标准是研究发表时间为 2021 年 7 月至 2024 年 4 月 10 日。本研究使用 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险,并采用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了 24 项回顾性研究,共涉及 11830 名患者。低确定性证据表明,FNC 与帕罗韦德在 COVID-19 患者中死亡率(OR=0.91,95%CI:0.76-1.08)或 LOHS(WMD=-0.24,95%CI:-0.83 至 0.35)无显著差异。低确定性证据表明,T-FNANC 更长(WMD=1.95,95%CI:0.36-3.53)。与帕罗韦德组相比,低确定性证据表明 FNC 组复合结局较差(OR=0.77,95%CI:0.63-0.95),不良事件较少(OR=0.63,95%CI:0.46-0.85)。与支持性治疗相比,低确定性证据表明 FNC 可显著降低 COVID-19 患者的死亡率(OR=0.61,95%CI:0.51-0.74)和复合结局(OR=0.67,95%CI:0.50-0.91),而极低确定性证据表明 T-FNANC 显著降低(WMD=-4.62,95%CI:-8.08 至-1.15)。然而,在极低确定性中,LOHS(WMD=-0.70,95%CI:-3.32 至 1.91)或不良事件(OR=1.97,95%CI:0.48-8.17)无显著差异。

结论

FNC 似乎是一种安全且潜在有效的 COVID-19 治疗方法,但需要进一步开展更大规模、高质量的研究来证实这些发现。由于证据的确定性和中国开展研究的具体情况,在考虑结果是否适用于全球时应谨慎。

试验注册

PROSPERO 编号:CRD42024520565。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/c4b2b7ba7062/CRJ-18-e13798-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/52022a7476cc/CRJ-18-e13798-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/a4f7066dc64f/CRJ-18-e13798-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/03b0e81a7ac4/CRJ-18-e13798-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/380888ffb8f6/CRJ-18-e13798-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/3f67cfa19285/CRJ-18-e13798-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/b0e108461b09/CRJ-18-e13798-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/cf4063e5f868/CRJ-18-e13798-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/b84ba19e5e6c/CRJ-18-e13798-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/13bf6b9a4f2f/CRJ-18-e13798-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/13e8218e50e9/CRJ-18-e13798-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/c4b2b7ba7062/CRJ-18-e13798-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/52022a7476cc/CRJ-18-e13798-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/a4f7066dc64f/CRJ-18-e13798-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/03b0e81a7ac4/CRJ-18-e13798-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/380888ffb8f6/CRJ-18-e13798-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/3f67cfa19285/CRJ-18-e13798-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/b0e108461b09/CRJ-18-e13798-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/cf4063e5f868/CRJ-18-e13798-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/b84ba19e5e6c/CRJ-18-e13798-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/13bf6b9a4f2f/CRJ-18-e13798-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/13e8218e50e9/CRJ-18-e13798-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfb/11240111/c4b2b7ba7062/CRJ-18-e13798-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Azvudine in Patients With COVID-19 in China: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.阿兹夫定在中国 COVID-19 患者中的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Respir J. 2024 Jul;18(7):e13798. doi: 10.1111/crj.13798.
2
Azvudine versus Paxlovid in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿兹夫定与奈玛特韦/利托那韦片治疗 COVID-19 的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Med Virol. 2024 Jul;34(4):e2551. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2551.
3
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.氯喹或羟氯喹预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 12;2(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2.
4
Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir, azvudine and paxlovid against mortality and viral clearance among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection during the omicron wave in China: A retrospective cohort study.奥密克戎变异株流行期间中国住院 COVID-19 感染者中莫努匹韦、阿兹夫定和奈玛特韦/利托那韦对比死亡率和病毒清除的真实世界疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;109(4):116353. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116353. Epub 2024 May 18.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Effectiveness of azvudine in reducing mortality of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿兹夫定降低 COVID-19 患者死亡率的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Feb 23;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02316-y.
7
Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus azvudine for adult inpatients with severe or critical COVID-19.奈玛特韦-利托那韦与阿兹夫定治疗成人重症或危重症 COVID-19 患者的有效性比较。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Apr 10;11(1):e001944. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001944.
8
Nirmatrelvir combined with ritonavir for preventing and treating COVID-19.奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片组合包装用于 COVID-19 的预防和治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 20;9(9):CD015395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015395.pub2.
9
Effectiveness and safety of azvudine in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阿兹夫定治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0298772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298772. eCollection 2024.
10
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus azvudine for adult inpatients with severe or critical COVID-19.奈玛特韦-利托那韦与阿兹夫定治疗成人重症或危重症 COVID-19 患者的有效性比较。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Apr 10;11(1):e001944. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001944.
2
Azvudine for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Diseases: A Single-Center, Real-World Experience.阿兹夫定治疗合并心血管疾病的 COVID-19 患者:一项单中心真实世界研究。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Jun;11(23):e2306050. doi: 10.1002/advs.202306050. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
A Retrospective Analysis of Azvudine in Patients with COVID-19 and Pre-existing Cancer.
阿兹夫定治疗新冠病毒病合并既往癌症患者的回顾性分析
J Cancer. 2024 Mar 4;15(8):2442-2447. doi: 10.7150/jca.91530. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of azvudine in reducing mortality of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿兹夫定降低 COVID-19 患者死亡率的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Virol J. 2024 Feb 23;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02316-y.
5
Antiviral effectiveness and survival correlation of azvudine and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in elderly severe patients with COVID-19: a retrospective real-world study.阿兹夫定与奈玛特韦/利托那韦治疗老年重症新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的抗病毒疗效及生存相关性:一项回顾性真实世界研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 9;69:102468. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102468. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Real-world effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus azvudine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the omicron wave in Beijing: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.奥密克戎变异株流行期间奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片与阿兹夫定治疗北京地区 COVID-19 住院患者的真实世界疗效:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08965-8.
7
Effectiveness and safety of azvudine in older adults with mild and moderate COVID-19: a retrospective observational study.阿兹夫定治疗轻中度 COVID-19 老年患者的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08944-z.
8
Azvudine versus paxlovid for oral treatment of COVID-19 in Chinese patients.阿兹夫定对比奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片组合药物用于中国 COVID-19 患者的口服治疗。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08828-2.
9
Comparison of Azvudine and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Combined Use in Patients with COVID-19.阿兹夫定与奈玛特韦/利托那韦对比及联合应用于新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Dec 22;16:7797-7808. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S433186. eCollection 2023.
10
Azvudine and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19: Emulation of a randomized target trial.阿兹夫定和奈玛特韦/利托那韦在中重度 COVID-19 住院患者中的应用:一项随机目标试验的模拟。
J Med Virol. 2023 Dec;95(12):e29318. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29318.