Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Suite 1360 Seattle, WA 98101-1466, United States.
Human Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Am J Hypertens. 2024 Oct 14;37(11):868-875. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae088.
Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension diagnostic methods.
Qualitative study within a randomized controlled diagnostic study conducted between May 2017 and March 2019 comparing the accuracy and acceptability of BP measurement methods among patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system. All participants completed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), plus either clinic BP, home BP monitoring (HBPM), or kiosk BP diagnostic testing. Qualitative interviewees (aged 31-76 years, n = 35) were recruited from the main study.
Participants who completed HBPM found it to be comfortable and low burden, and believed it produced accurate results. Participants in the clinic arm described clinic measurements as inconvenient. Participants in the kiosk arm overall did not favor kiosks due to concerns about accuracy and privacy. Participants described ABPM as the most accurate method due to repeated measurements over the 24-hour period in real-world contexts, but many found it uncomfortable and disruptive. Participants also noted methods that involved repeated measures such as HBPM and ABPM particularly influenced their understanding of whether or not they had hypertension.
Hypertension diagnostic methods that include more BP measurements help patients gain a deeper understanding of BP variability and the lower reliability of infrequent measurements in the clinic. These findings warrant implementing strategies to enhance out-of-office BP diagnostic testing in primary care.
Trial number NCT03130257.
在进行新的高血压诊断时,建议进行非诊室血压(BP)测量。然而,在实践中,高血压主要通过诊室血压进行诊断。本研究旨在了解患者对高血压诊断方法的准确性和以患者为中心的态度。
这是一项在 2017 年 5 月至 2019 年 3 月期间在一个综合医疗保健提供系统中进行的、比较 BP 测量方法准确性和可接受性的随机对照诊断研究中的定性研究。所有参与者均完成 24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM),外加诊室 BP、家庭 BP 监测(HBPM)或 kiosk BP 诊断测试。从主要研究中招募了 35 名年龄在 31-76 岁之间的定性受访者。
完成 HBPM 的参与者认为它舒适且负担低,并认为它能产生准确的结果。在诊室组的参与者描述了诊室测量的不便。由于对准确性和隐私的担忧, kiosk 组的参与者总体上不喜欢 kiosk。参与者描述 ABPM 是最准确的方法,因为它在现实环境中进行了 24 小时的重复测量,但许多人认为它不舒服且具有干扰性。参与者还指出,像 HBPM 和 ABPM 这样涉及重复测量的方法特别影响他们对是否患有高血压的理解。
包括更多 BP 测量的高血压诊断方法有助于患者更深入地了解 BP 变异性以及在诊室中不频繁测量的较低可靠性。这些发现需要实施策略来加强初级保健中的非诊室 BP 诊断测试。
试验编号 NCT03130257。