Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Information Management, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 12;19(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02941-2.
The treatment for bilateral synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) remains challenging. Simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) may be an optimal treatment with curative intent, but its safety and feasibility are controversial.
One hundred and fifty-eight patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral VATS (simultaneous group) and 79 who underwent two-staged bilateral VATS (two-staged group) were included in this study. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.
The majority of patients were female and non-smokers. The most common surgical plan was lobectomy and contralateral wedge resection in both groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate between the simultaneous groups and two-staged group (13.3% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.73). Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral resection had shorter hospital stays, shorter anesthesia time and less chest drainage compared with those who underwent two-staged resection. Advanced TNM stage, complicated surgical plan and aggressive lymph node resection were risk factors for postoperative complications in simultaneous bilateral VATS. Patients in two groups had similar overall survival and disease free survival (p = 0.2).
Simultaneous bilateral VATS for bilateral lung nodule resection is as safe and feasible as two-staged bilateral VATS. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral resection had similar or even better outcomes compared to that of the two-staged group. Simultaneous bilateral VATS is potentially an optimal treatment option for patients with erarly cTNM stage and good physical condition.
双侧同步性多原发性肺癌(MPLC)的治疗仍然具有挑战性。根治性目的下同期双侧电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)可能是一种最佳治疗方法,但它的安全性和可行性存在争议。
本研究纳入了 158 例行同期双侧 VATS(同期组)和 79 例行分期双侧 VATS(分期组)的患者。回顾性分析了他们的病历资料。
大多数患者为女性且不吸烟。两组最常见的手术方案均为肺叶切除术和对侧楔形切除术。同期组和分期组的术后并发症发生率无显著差异(13.3%比 11.4%,p=0.73)。与分期组相比,同期双侧切除术患者的住院时间更短、麻醉时间更短、胸腔引流更少。高级别 TNM 分期、复杂的手术方案和积极的淋巴结清扫是同期双侧 VATS 术后并发症的危险因素。两组患者的总生存率和无病生存率无显著差异(p=0.2)。
同期双侧 VATS 用于双侧肺结节切除术与分期双侧 VATS 一样安全且可行。同期双侧切除术患者的预后与分期组相似,甚至更好。对于早期 cTNM 分期和身体状况良好的患者,同期双侧 VATS 可能是一种潜在的最佳治疗选择。