Suppr超能文献

[F]FDG-PET/CT在疑似感染或炎症的异质性住院患者群体中的诊断率与经典不明原因发热患者的检查结果相当。

The Diagnostic Yield of [F]FDG-PET/CT in a Heterogeneous In-Patient Population with Suspected Infection or Inflammation Is Comparable to Findings in Patients with Classic Fever of Unknown Origin.

作者信息

Becker Kristian Kimer, Søholm Jacob, Hess Søren

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.

IRIS-Imaging Research Initiative Southwest, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 3;14(13):1420. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131420.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Suspected infection or inflammation of unknown origin in in-patients remains challenging. Literature on [F]FDG-PET/CT is abundant in classic fever of unknown origin (FUO), but evidence is complex and may not always reflect clinical reality. This study explores the application of [F]FDG-PET/CT in a diverse clinical population of in-patients with suspected infection not defined by stringent FUO-criteria.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of consecutive in-patients who underwent [F]FDG-PET/CT in the workup of suspected infection or inflammation from 1 July 2022 to 31 December 2022 was conducted. We evaluated indications, diagnostic yield, and clinical impact of [F]FDG-PET/CT, and compared the findings of [F]FDG-PET/CT and stand-alone CT. Univariate logistic regression assessed associations between [F]FDG-PET/CT outcome and clinical parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis evaluated diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

77 patients met the inclusion criteria. [F]FDG-PET/CT established a diagnosis in 35% of cases, ruled out focal infection in 26%, and thus was helpful in 61% of patients. It prompted 72 additional examinations resulting in seven incidental diagnoses, including two cancers. Antibiotic treatment was changed in 26% of cases. Regression analysis found white blood cell counts (WBC) associated with true positive outcomes. [F]FDG-PET/CT was compared to stand-alone CT findings, and was concordant in 69% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Results were comparable to findings in more classic FUO. [F]FDG-PET/CT was clinically helpful in 61% of cases but also prompted many additional examinations with relatively few clinically important findings. WBC count was a predictor of true positive outcome. CT and [F]FDG-PET/CT were discordant in 31%, of cases, especially in cases of endocarditis and spondylodiscitis.

摘要

引言

住院患者中病因不明的疑似感染或炎症仍然具有挑战性。关于[F]FDG-PET/CT的文献在经典的不明原因发热(FUO)中很丰富,但证据复杂,可能并不总是反映临床实际情况。本研究探讨了[F]FDG-PET/CT在一组多样化的、不符合严格FUO标准的疑似感染住院患者中的应用。

方法

对2022年7月1日至2022年12月31日期间因疑似感染或炎症而接受[F]FDG-PET/CT检查的连续住院患者进行回顾性病历审查。我们评估了[F]FDG-PET/CT的检查指征、诊断率和临床影响,并比较了[F]FDG-PET/CT和单纯CT的检查结果。单因素逻辑回归分析评估了[F]FDG-PET/CT结果与临床参数之间的关联。受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析评估了诊断性能。

结果

77例患者符合纳入标准。[F]FDG-PET/CT在35%的病例中明确了诊断,在26%的病例中排除了局灶性感染,因此对61%的患者有帮助。它促使进行了另外72项检查,其中有7项意外诊断,包括2例癌症。26%的病例改变了抗生素治疗方案。回归分析发现白细胞计数(WBC)与真阳性结果相关。将[F]FDG-PET/CT与单纯CT的检查结果进行比较,69%的病例结果一致。

结论

结果与在更典型的FUO中的发现相当。[F]FDG-PET/CT在61%的病例中对临床有帮助,但也促使进行了许多额外检查,而具有临床重要意义的发现相对较少。白细胞计数是真阳性结果的一个预测指标。CT和[F]FDG-PET/CT在31%的病例中结果不一致,特别是在心内膜炎和脊椎椎间盘炎病例中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2417/11241151/98c0a81a9f5a/diagnostics-14-01420-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验